The Long Goodbye : Understanding it: Great summary of hidden/missing elements of the plot
Re: Understanding it: Great summary of hidden/missing elements of the plot
I wonder if this stuff is in the book or not. It's amazingly concise and makes perfect sense. Great piece. Thanks for posting this.
Re: Understanding it: Great summary of hidden/missing elements of the plot
No, it's not from the book. The movie doesn't even follow the book. This piece is explaining the movie, not the book.
Yeah, it is a great piece, isn't it? I'm glad you enjoyed it.
.
Post deleted
This message has been deleted.
Re: Understanding it: Great summary of hidden/missing elements of the plot
I have no idea who wrote it it's on the Talk page of the film's Wikipedia article. The posting is signed by a Wikipedia editor [EDIT: Actually, it's not even signed! But I can see in the edit history who posted it.], but it doesn't say he wrote it or where he got it. I guess one could try Googling phrases from it and see if anything comes up [EDIT: Nothing comes up but that Talk page].
I'm glad you enjoyed it I appreciated it very much as well! It filled in a lot of blanks for me!
.
Re: Understanding it: Great summary of hidden/missing elements of the plot
It's like good jazz, its form is made real based on the notes it knows not to play, until the end.
Post deleted
This message has been deleted.
Re: Understanding it: Great summary of hidden/missing elements of the plot
It's a very good piece, thanks a lot.
Re: Understanding it: Great summary of hidden/missing elements of the plot
Yeah thanks, that's a great summary. Fortunately, and this reflects part of Altman's genius in The Long Goodbye, a viewer doesn't really need a comprehensive understanding of all the plot's twist and turns to appreciate the film's greatness. In fact, for the most part a shallow understanding will do just fine. I probably watched it 5 or 6 times, just letting the voices and tones and imagery wash over me, before I started thinking seriously about any of the deeper character motivations, plot elements and how all the moving parts fit together. At the moment I'm up to 11 viewings and it's one of the few films in my regular movie viewing repertoire that gets better every I time I watch it.
Now for a specific point, and FWIWI'm not really convinced with the summary's notion that Eileen's caper included Roger being a suicide. Although Chandler's criminals are usually quite adept at predicting the behavior of other characters and often build their schemes around that awareness, the idea that Eileen's immediate plan called for the suicide of Roger seems a bit of a stretch, because unlike other forms of death, suicide relies so strongly on contingencies that reside within the sole control of the person killing themselves. Roger was definitely unhinged and quite unstable. But to such a level and to such an extent that he could be relied on to knock himself off with certainty and more or less on cue? I kinda doubt it. Rather I sensed, mostly from the manner in which the party and post-party scenes were built up and from Eileen's reactions, that the suicide was unexpected, and that she smartly used the event to improvise, on the spot, a story implicating Roger in Sylvia's murder in order to more firmly close up any open questions about her death that might still be lingering in the eyes of the police, and to deflect any pressure that might be coming her way from Augustine because of Roger's somewhat mysterious prior dealings with him. I dunno. Eileen was definitely one smart chica. Maybe Marlowe was in fact her pawn in a suicide play. I don't recall what the book had to say on this. Anyway it's just a hunch, and like I said before, one way or the other it doesn't really matter
Now for a specific point, and FWIWI'm not really convinced with the summary's notion that Eileen's caper included Roger being a suicide. Although Chandler's criminals are usually quite adept at predicting the behavior of other characters and often build their schemes around that awareness, the idea that Eileen's immediate plan called for the suicide of Roger seems a bit of a stretch, because unlike other forms of death, suicide relies so strongly on contingencies that reside within the sole control of the person killing themselves. Roger was definitely unhinged and quite unstable. But to such a level and to such an extent that he could be relied on to knock himself off with certainty and more or less on cue? I kinda doubt it. Rather I sensed, mostly from the manner in which the party and post-party scenes were built up and from Eileen's reactions, that the suicide was unexpected, and that she smartly used the event to improvise, on the spot, a story implicating Roger in Sylvia's murder in order to more firmly close up any open questions about her death that might still be lingering in the eyes of the police, and to deflect any pressure that might be coming her way from Augustine because of Roger's somewhat mysterious prior dealings with him. I dunno. Eileen was definitely one smart chica. Maybe Marlowe was in fact her pawn in a suicide play. I don't recall what the book had to say on this. Anyway it's just a hunch, and like I said before, one way or the other it doesn't really matter
Re: Understanding it: Great summary of hidden/missing elements of the plot
"Sylvia was definitely one smart chica".
You mean Eileen, I trust.
Its probably reasonable to expect Eileen was planning to eventually off her hubby herself (which is what she did in the book, trying to make it look like a suicide), but possibly gave him a little time to try and make good on his apparent suicidal tendencies. And her dealings with Marlowe definitely looked like an attempt to make Roger jealous.
Generally though the book is, of course, radically different when it comes to who killed whom and why (additionally, while there were a few gangsters peripherally involved, they didnt have any financial stake in the proceedings), so its useless as a manual for the movie. And despite Chandlers novels being notoriously difficult to unravel, I found the films plot even more complicated. Thanks to the OP for laying out what looks to be a fairly watertight explanation.
"facts are stupid things" - Ronald Reagan
You mean Eileen, I trust.
Its probably reasonable to expect Eileen was planning to eventually off her hubby herself (which is what she did in the book, trying to make it look like a suicide), but possibly gave him a little time to try and make good on his apparent suicidal tendencies. And her dealings with Marlowe definitely looked like an attempt to make Roger jealous.
Generally though the book is, of course, radically different when it comes to who killed whom and why (additionally, while there were a few gangsters peripherally involved, they didnt have any financial stake in the proceedings), so its useless as a manual for the movie. And despite Chandlers novels being notoriously difficult to unravel, I found the films plot even more complicated. Thanks to the OP for laying out what looks to be a fairly watertight explanation.
"facts are stupid things" - Ronald Reagan
Re: Understanding it: Great summary of hidden/missing elements of the plot
Thanks. It's been awhile since I looked at the book. Thanks also for catching my Sylvia/Eileen swapI edited the flub.
Re: Understanding it: Great summary of hidden/missing elements of the plot
Yeah and I've just seen it once and I don't think I came anywhere close to drawing up a comprehensive detailed map of all the events that Eileen and Terry orchestrated to get their happily-ever-after such as the one posted in the OP. And I also agree about the "improvisation" bit. Eileen used the situation to her advantage but it's very likely she would have offed the old bloke eventually.
Fortunately, and this reflects part of Altman's genius in The Long Goodbye, a viewer doesn't really need a comprehensive understanding of all the plot's twist and turns to appreciate the film's greatness. In fact, for the most part a shallow understanding will do just fine. I probably watched it 5 or 6 times, just letting the voices and tones and imagery wash over me, before I started thinking seriously about any of the deeper character motivations, plot elements and how all the moving parts fit together.
Clear eyes, full hearts, can't lose.
Re: Understanding it: Great summary of hidden/missing elements of the pl
Two reasons it's not a stretch that she thought she could manipulate a suicide:
First, he's obvously pretty far gone with the drinking-at some point she probably thought that at the very least she could fake one;
but more inmportantly, during the conversation between Marlow and Roger as they sit and drink, he mentions suicide to Marlow-"Have you ever considered suicide?" or somethingso it's not far from his mind.
As far as the OP's Wikipedia post, it's pretty much spot on except on one point: She is not getting her husband's money, I thought it was made clear at one point that she was the one who brought money to the marriage, and that actually he had not written anything successful in quite a while. So she wasn't getting rid of him for money, and used her own money, not Roger's, to pay back the $350,000
First, he's obvously pretty far gone with the drinking-at some point she probably thought that at the very least she could fake one;
but more inmportantly, during the conversation between Marlow and Roger as they sit and drink, he mentions suicide to Marlow-"Have you ever considered suicide?" or somethingso it's not far from his mind.
As far as the OP's Wikipedia post, it's pretty much spot on except on one point: She is not getting her husband's money, I thought it was made clear at one point that she was the one who brought money to the marriage, and that actually he had not written anything successful in quite a while. So she wasn't getting rid of him for money, and used her own money, not Roger's, to pay back the $350,000
Re: Understanding it: Great summary of hidden/missing elements of the plot
Great stuff, thanks for posting. This jibes with the theories I had developed on my own, but it's much more fleshed-out.
I know I'm shouting, I like to shout.
I know I'm shouting, I like to shout.
Re: Understanding it: Great summary of hidden/missing elements of the pl
That's good stuff. I'm commenting to bump it again.
I looked up "The Long Goodbye" after watching the new (as I post this) "Inherent Vice", which was said to be something of a spiritual cousin, perhaps somewhat skewed toward "The Big Lebowski".
I looked up "The Long Goodbye" after watching the new (as I post this) "Inherent Vice", which was said to be something of a spiritual cousin, perhaps somewhat skewed toward "The Big Lebowski".
Re: Understanding it: Great summary of hidden/missing elements of the pl
Thanks, T. It is very valuable information, I agree.
.
.
Understanding it: Great summary of hidden/missing elements of the plot
Found this on a Wikipedia "Talk" page, and it's very informative. Don't know who wrote it.
.