Politics : What do you think of trans athletes competing against biological females?

It seems unfair. Men are naturally more muscular than women and higher levels of testosterone may give a competitive advantage. There should be some metric that physically establishes physical gender as a requirement to competing. I think if a male is taking hormones but still has a wiener they should still be considered male. It leads us down the path of what makes a man separate from a woman? Hormone levels? Physical anatomy? Emotional identification of gender? It’s such a sticky subject. Or should trans athletes compete only against other trans athletes? Does this then become discrimination?

---

Hey Diddler, Diddler….the cat and the fiddler LOL

Dag Hammarskjold

---

Smells like Ass in here

Go sniff a foot.

---

Hey Diddler, Diddler….the cat and the fiddler LOL

Dag Hammarskjold

---

Smells like Ass in here

Blocked.

---

Hey Diddler, Diddler….the cat and the fiddler LOL

Lol

---

The State Of You Mate!!

Dag Hammarskjold

---

Smells like Ass in here

🛴🚲🛵🏍️🇺🇲

---

🚴🚴🚴🇺🇲👍😎

No this is just plain bullshit.

---

The State Of You Mate!!

Ya know what is funny in this debate is how both sides of lib and con are changing themselves.

Libs were always on the side of women's rights. And now when trannies are trying to integrate themselves into women's sports the libs are on their side because they are afraid to discriminate the trannies!

Repubs are always against equal rights for women and trying to control their bodies.
And now they are against trannies integrating themselves into women's sports as if they now care about women's rights pointing out how unfair this is to women!

So I see hypocrisy coming from both sides.

---

"Please vote to preserve the unique character of Warren…" - Robert Duvall

Republicans are NOT against equal rights for women. They're against women murdering innocent unborn babies. They're also against men murdering innocent unborn babies. So no, it is NOT hypocricy!

---

😺 Schrodinger's Cat walks into a bar, and doesn't. 😠 Let's go, Brandon!

Except they are not sentient babies/beings since they are unborn, so I do have to add there is a degree of hypocrisy and not all republicans would think it is murder either and many republicans would have also had abortions, or engaged in them.

---

Norman! What did you put in my tea?

Are you actually saying that they only become sentient beings after they're born?? So they're NOT sentient beings 30 seconds before they're born? That's BULLSHIT! They are human beings regardless of where they are in the growth process, and abortion is murder!

---

😺 Schrodinger's Cat walks into a bar, and doesn't. 😠 Let's go, Brandon!

So they're NOT sentient beings 30 seconds before they're born? That's BULLSHIT! They are human beings regardless of where they are in the growth process, and abortion is murder!

Science says they are not sentient until birthed.

How many babies are aborted 30seconds before they are born? If there are childbirth complications this could happen, but that is for the sake of the mother's life.

The vast majority of pregnant women would know if they want their child or not by the first trimester and who is to know who has had abortions in their lifetime?

You may be surprised at how many women abort their child and they just take a pill for it.

If you found out someone you love and care about had an abortion, would you label her a murderer? Its inconsequential to anyone else.

---

Norman! What did you put in my tea?

Bullshit! Science does NOT say that! It's murder!

And okay, you want to quibble about the 30 seconds? Then where do you draw the line? Two minutes? Two weeks? Two months? Six months? Who gets to play god and decide that??

---

😺 Schrodinger's Cat walks into a bar, and doesn't. 😠 Let's go, Brandon!

Science doesn’t say it’s murder either, that is just your distorted judgement here.

You certainly don’t get to decide what is murder based on something that has sweet FA to do with you and God has nothing to do with it.

You are being completely and utterly wrongheaded on this subject and I don’t understand why it outrages you. You are sounding off like an hysterical loony leftist.

---

Norman! What did you put in my tea?

Science has nothing to do with it. Murder is a legal term. And yes, as a matter of fact, I DO get to decide that it's murder. That's my opinion, and I have a right to it. And my reference to god was metaphorical, since I'm an Agnostic.

And it's also my opinion that YOU are utterly wrongheaded and rather arrogant on this subject. And abortion angers me because it's the premeditated killing of a human being, i.e. murder. And I can't understand why you can't can't comprehend that.

---

😺 Schrodinger's Cat walks into a bar, and doesn't. 😠 Let's go, Brandon!

So you are saying science does determine a fetus as a sentient being, living and breathing CO2?

You may need to look at the kind of person you have become, instead of getting all fessed up and wrongheaded about something that you have a distorted stance on and not to mention displaced control issues regarding abortion.

No one said you couldn't have an opinion, but its like anything on here, no one said others have to agree with it either and as often happens, some opinions that are wrongheaded will get challenged.

Stop it with your virtue signalling, because the reality is, is you don't really care.

---

Norman! What did you put in my tea?

I'll say this again, since you were obviously not paying attention. Science has nothing to do with murder. Murder is a legal and moral term.

And you need to look at the kind of person you are, instead of being so arrogant, and claiming that I'm wrongheaded. Do you have a monopoly on truth? Your opinion of my stance is just that, your opinion.

And I didn't say you needed to agree with my opinion. Just don't insult me about it. And I'm not virtue signaling, I'm expressing my opinion.

And you say I don't care? When did you obtain the power to know what someone else is thinking? That is more arrogance. I'm beginning to understand why so many people voted you as a bad poster in a recent poll. You're very arrogant.

---

😺 Schrodinger's Cat walks into a bar, and doesn't. 😠 Let's go, Brandon!

Murder is a legal and moral term.

And how does that make abortion murder and based on whose abstract legalities and whose abstract morals?

And you need to look at the kind of person you are, instead of being so arrogant, and claiming that I'm wrongheaded. Do you have a monopoly on truth? Your opinion of my stance is just that, your opinion.

Your stance is wrongheaded, because you are being immoral and unethical due to ignorant condemnation and if I'm being arrogant here, its because I'm being confronted with it.

I didn't say you needed to agree with my opinion. Just don't insult me about it. And I'm not virtue signaling, I'm expressing my opinion.

You are expressing a virtue signalling opinion about some abstract thing that gets aborted. It doesn't exist, it doesn't affect you and you are getting all outraged. That is ripe for insulting.

When did you obtain the power to know what someone else is thinking? That is more arrogance. I'm beginning to understand why so many people voted you as a bad poster in a recent poll. You're very arrogant.

Your tells are showing. I may be arrogant, but at least I'm one of the best….

---

Norman! What did you put in my tea?

It's murder based on my morals.

No, your stance is wrongheaded, ignorant and arrogant.

If I'm virtue signaling, then so are you. And yes, I do tend to get upset about murder.

And yes you are arrogant, and I wouldn't be proud of it if I were you.

---

😺 Schrodinger's Cat walks into a bar, and doesn't. 😠 Let's go, Brandon!

And yes you are arrogant, and I wouldn't be proud of it if I were you.

But I am proud of it, you have called me out on my awesome arrogance…

If you can prove to me that you run a home/shelter for unwanted children and go out of your way to support, nurture and educate them and do it unconditionally out of love, commitment and a genuine need to help those less fortunate, I will take back what I said about you not caring about un-birthed foetuses that are internally hosting of another being whose sentient life came first.

---

Norman! What did you put in my tea?

You are SO arrogant, SO wrong, and SO moronic.

---

😺 Schrodinger's Cat walks into a bar, and doesn't. 😠 Let's go, Brandon!

---

Norman! What did you put in my tea?

ToastedCheese said...

expand

Moron.

---

😺 Schrodinger's Cat walks into a bar, and doesn't. 😠 Let's go, Brandon!

MovieManCin2 said... Moron.

expand

But nice!

---

Norman! What did you put in my tea?

ToastedCheese said... But nice!

expand

No, arrogant.

---

😺 Schrodinger's Cat walks into a bar, and doesn't. 😠 Let's go, Brandon!

MovieManCin2 said... No, arrogant.

expand

Nicely Arrogant….

---

Norman! What did you put in my tea?

ToastedCheese said... Nicely Arrogant….

expand

---

😺 Schrodinger's Cat walks into a bar, and doesn't. 😠 Let's go, Brandon!

MovieManCin2 said...

expand

Don't forget smug too….

---

Norman! What did you put in my tea?

ToastedCheese said... Don't forget smug too….

expand

Yep.

---

😺 Schrodinger's Cat walks into a bar, and doesn't. 😠 Let's go, Brandon!

MovieManCin2 said... Yep.

expand

---

Norman! What did you put in my tea?

ToastedCheese said...

expand

---

😺 Schrodinger's Cat walks into a bar, and doesn't. 😠 Let's go, Brandon!

HAHAHAHA!!!

Thanks for that intelligent and pithy reply.

---

😺 Schrodinger's Cat walks into a bar, and doesn't. 😠 Let's go, Brandon!

Repubs are always against equal rights for women and trying to control their bodies.

No, you epic dumbass. We are FOR equal rights for women. However we also differentialte between women and their unborn children. We uphold THEIR human rights as well.

---

Sometime one must play the Devil in order put the fear of God into some dumb sumbitch.

We are FOR equal rights for women.

Uh huh.
Riiiiight.

Senate Republicans defeat women’s equal pay bill, again

WASHINGTON—By a party-line 50-49 vote, every Senate Republican—even the women—defeated HR7, the bill to put teeth into the Equal Pay Act that helps working women

Unions and women’s groups strongly supported the legislation, authored, as usual, by influential Rep. Rosa DeLauro, D-Conn. It would put teeth into the almost 60-year-old Equal Pay Act by eliminating corporate excuses for discriminating against women in pay. Instead, firms would have to prove unequal pay is not due to prejudice against women workers.

It also would make it easier for wronged women workers to find out, in broad categories, what their privileged male colleagues with the same credentials earn, and to sue if their pay isn’t equal.

Organized labor and women’s groups strongly supported the measure. So did Senate Democrats, led by Senate Labor Committee Chair Patty Murray, D-Wash., and Majority Whip Dick Durbin, D-Ill., the only two who spoke before the vote. The GOP shut up.

“The Paycheck Fairness Act is a long overdue remedial measure that responds to the demonstrated inadequacies of the 1963 Equal Pay Act,” AFL-CIO Legislative Director Bill Samuel wrote lawmakers before the roll call.

“Although the Equal Pay Act made it illegal for employers to pay unequal wages to male and female employees who perform the same work, wage disparities between men and women persist in both the private and public sectors, at every educational level,” nationwide.

“Women working full time are paid only 82 cents for every dollar paid to men, and this gap is greater for women of color. Without intervention, the wage gap between all men and women is not expected to close until 2059 and will take significantly longer for Black and Latina women.

“While belonging to a union is the surest way to guarantee equal pay on the job—unionized women earn some 27% more than do their non-union counterparts—the Paycheck Fairness Act would provide new effective tools to close the wage gap,” he said.

https://www.peoplesworld.org/article/senate-republicans-defeat-womens-equal-pay-bill-again

@MovieManCin2

---

"Please vote to preserve the unique character of Warren…" - Robert Duvall

Fake news. That's the Leftist story. I would be willing to bet they added something else objectionable to the bill.

---

😺 Schrodinger's Cat walks into a bar, and doesn't. 😠 Let's go, Brandon!

MYTH: Women earn 77 cents [amount varies depending upon who is spouting the bullshit] for every dollar a man earns—for doing the same work.

FACTS: No matter how many times this wage gap claim is decisively refuted by economists, it always comes back. The bottom line: the 23-cent gender pay gap is simply the difference between the average earnings of all men and women working full-time. It does not account for differences in occupations, positions, education, job tenure or hours worked per week. When such relevant factors are considered, the wage gap narrows to the point of vanishing.

Wage gap activists say women with identical backgrounds and jobs as men still earn less. But they always fail to take into account critical variables. Activist groups like the National Organization for Women have a fallback position: that women’s education and career choices are not truly free—they are driven by powerful sexist stereotypes. In this view, women’s tendency to retreat from the workplace to raise children or to enter fields like early childhood education and psychology, rather than better paying professions like petroleum engineering, is evidence of continued social coercion. Here is the problem: American women are among the best informed and most self-determining human beings in the world. To say that they are manipulated into their life choices by forces beyond their control is divorced from reality and demeaning, to boot.

---

Sometime one must play the Devil in order put the fear of God into some dumb sumbitch.

Great post.

My daughter has chosen to teach elementary school children. She absolutely adores working with young kids. There are no male teachers at her school.

Can you imagine a man declaring that he absolutely adores working with little kids? He'd rightly be considered a pedophile.

There are fundamental differences between men and women. These are never even accepted, never mind factored in to the alleged wage gap discussion.

---

Check my block list because you're probably on it.

There seems to be a notion amongst many on the loony left side, who lack honed critical thinking skills, that gender is an abstract and that men and women can be equal existing in the ether , and ignore the fact that objective and biological differences will determine many differences and will also dictate vocational interests too.

---

Norman! What did you put in my tea?

Exactly. Humans have evolved over approximately 500,000 years. In all that time, everyone knew that men and women were different.

It's staggering that we've now decided there's no difference. Without any evidence. Just the notion that it's not fair because men have some sort of privilege.

There are many deceased young men, whose remains litter thousands of battlefields all over the planet, who would like to say something about that.

---

Check my block list because you're probably on it.

---

😺 Schrodinger's Cat walks into a bar, and doesn't. 😠 Let's go, Brandon!

Republicans have always supported women’s rights. I was against the ERA back in the 70’s because it said “on account of sex” which would have legalized rape and pedophillia, but leftists are going to pretend sex is gender in a court of law.
I’m against trans athletes butting women out of our own sports. I don’t understand how that type of craziness is going around. Men wearing women’s faces and “bodies” telling women how to be women. I figure they’re all on meth or something.

I think some or most or perhaps even all are men who were losing in that sport to other men so they pretend to be a woman just so they can finally win against others in competition.
And maybe some want to ogle naked chicks in the locker rooms and showers.

I bet that if they made it all just be trans vs trans athletes only you would see tons of them checking out and jumping ship.
And yeah, that is how it should be otherwise it is unfair.

---

"Please vote to preserve the unique character of Warren…" - Robert Duvall

Dag Hammarskjold

Go fuck yourself, dummy.

---

Hey Diddler, Diddler….the cat and the fiddler LOL

Well you're the one stupidly trying to transition from HEALTH CARE TO SECONDARY SCHOOL TEACHING.


You're an idiot. It's two completely different careers. Einstein you ain't. Lol

You’re the idiot. I was applying for a teaching position WITHIN MY FIELD. I don’t expect an out of work welfare mom piece of shit to understand the life of someone who works. Stick to what you know: food stamps and crack you worthless pile of crap.

Seriously you’re unemployed, uneducated, lost custody of your own kids and your own mom hates you. Figure out some of the problems in your own life before you come after mine. You’re a waste of oxygen. Goddamn welfare crack mother. Were you’re kids addicted to crack too when they came out?

---

Hey Diddler, Diddler….the cat and the fiddler LOL

If they went through puberty then they should not be allowed to compete against women. Puberty results in irreversible physical changes that give advantages in sports over women. That's why there is no difference in athletic ability between prepubescent boys and girls but by the time they are fifteen the top boys can beat the top women.