Just Shoot Me! : COVER GIRLS: Were they kidding?!

COVER GIRLS: Were they kidding?!

Just to exemplify:

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com:443/data.filmboards/images/upload/YQIsb.jpg
https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com:443/data.filmboards/images/upload/gynyr.jpg

Don't get me wrong. These're decent looking girls. But come on! On the cover of a vogue-esque fashion magazine? Which we have to stare a couple times during an episode?? Seriously, what were they thinking? Why were some of the cover girls really gorgeous and some of them are like.. u know..

Re: COVER GIRLS: Were they kidding?!

Oh please. It's a show about the people who work for the fashion magazine not the people on the magazine. They weren't going to waste their budget to pay high end models to pose for a fake cover shot.

Re: COVER GIRLS: Were they kidding?!

How much money does it take to get an easy-on-the-eyes girl if not hot? Even the cheapest porn sites get better girls. And this situation was almost exclusive to season 4 for some reason. It just got back to normal in season 5 again, girls were again ok to appear on a fashion magazine. So I was wondering if they were trying to make some sort of statement or something, cause money excuse is kinda ridiculous

Re: COVER GIRLS: Were they kidding?!

Fiction. On TV. Who. Really Cares.

Wait. You do. And probably the only one.

Re: COVER GIRLS: Were they kidding?!

awful attempt at trolling

Re: COVER GIRLS: Were they kidding?!

Because beauty is in the eye of the beholder. They look fine to me.

http://mo3del.ru/files/pic_models/spoilers.jpg

Re: COVER GIRLS: Were they kidding?!

Uh these girls are just as good looking as the cover models real magazines use who can actually be quite peculiar looking, I mean does anyone really think Kate Moss is the least bit attractive?

BTW Isn't that Uma Thurman in that first photo?

Re: COVER GIRLS: Were they kidding?!

Uma? God NO! lol

Re: COVER GIRLS: Were they kidding?!


quasi, I think those two are the same woman.

I guess it's like looking at clouds. You see one thing and I see another. Peace.

Re: COVER GIRLS: Were they kidding?!

i really dont think so :)

Re: COVER GIRLS: Were they kidding?!

you make a great point, details count.

Re: COVER GIRLS: Were they kidding?!

They're pretty enough but I wish they didn't have that "I just rolled out of bed" hair {was that the fad in those years}. The striped was pretty plain too.

Re: COVER GIRLS: Were they kidding?!

I think that Blush was supposed to be a Cosmo-type rather than a Vogue-esque magazine and the covers reflected that.

Re: COVER GIRLS: Were they kidding?!

lol Are you in jr high?

suzycreamcheese RIP Heath Ledger 1979-2008
Top