Dragonlance: Dragons of Autumn Twilight : retarded budget

retarded budget

Ok I am assuming that the budget for this movie was REALLY SMALL. In which case there should not have been a single actor that I recognized. Wasting a single cent on any kind of real actor and leaving the animation, script, storyline, and pretty much everything else this bad was the single worst decision made in entertainment since "undefeatable."

I blame these people for ruining any shot these books ever had at getting a decent movie and hope they are relegated to making stupid youtube special fx videos for the rest of their lives.

Also being that I already hated Kiefer Sutherland (cause lets face it 24 fans are everything wrong with America) I have to say that I no longer find Lucy Lawless hot or Michelle Trachtenburg quirky-sexy for being a part of this when they should have just left it alone.

The fact that people actually make this kind of stuff without any pride in their work or sense of duty towards the original authors just makes me sick.

Post deleted

This message has been deleted.

Re: retarded budget

That made sense until the idiotic statement "cause lets face it 24 fans are everything wrong with America."

Re: retarded budget

What's wrong with the 24 comment? Yes, okay, he used hyperbole to get a point across. It's called exaggeration. And it's very near correct all the same. 24 is laughably repetitive, inane, disgustingly genericboring drivel.

I also couldn't believe the quality of the voice acting when I actually saw the parts of this movie I could stomach. They must have blown their entire wad on them, that's the only way I see this steaming pile as possible. I mean, it's only Dragonlance; it isn't exactly the peak of fantasy literature. So I don't really care. But still, could they have tried harder to ruin a franchise?

Post deleted

This message has been deleted.
Top