Fifty Shades Darker : No male full frontal nudity?

Is that true? Then why are the ladies even watching this sh!t?

Male frontal nudity would give it an X rating and I have no idea why women watch. I wish the books would have been done properly

Why was fifty shades even created? Is the author a sex addict or something?

She based it off Twilight and these are the author's fantasies.

Figured that out when I saw the author and Dakota Johnson (Ana) were standing next to each other, they look alike.

---

Male frontal nudity would give it an X rating

---

No it won't, male full frontal can in R rated movies!

Penis gets an NC-17 rating if we see the mans penis in a sexual situation.

It gets an R rating if we see it in a comical situation, which is why comedies show penis for LOLs (even though its never actually funny) but a movie like Fifty Shades? It becomes NC-17

---

Penis gets an NC-17 rating if we see the mans penis in a sexual situation.

It gets an R rating if we see it in a comical situation, which is why comedies show penis for LOLs (even though its never actually funny) but a movie like Fifty Shades? It becomes NC-1

---

Nope!

Example: Ben Affleck and Neil Patrick Harris in Gone Girl which is R rated!

Youre talking about those half second glimpses of their penis???? Most people didnt even notice it was shown. Its not even a full second.

NPH was covered in blood from his death and Afflecks was as he walked in the shower.

Jason Segel, Tom Hardy and Michael Fassbender all went full frontal and didn't get the X rating.

Adam Sandler should go full frontal.

When does Dakota show everything? You only get a side chance at her pubic hair in the first film if you pause the scene.

---

Penis gets an NC-17 rating if we see the mans penis in a sexual situation.

It gets an R rating if we see it in a comical situation, which is why comedies show penis for LOLs (even though its never actually funny) but a movie like Fifty Shades? It becomes NC-17

---

Learn to read.

Even back when Fast Times at Ridgemont High was being made and they had the sex scene, they were gonna show dick but the MPAA gave it an automatic X because they showed a penis in a sex scene. The filmmakers fought to have him be full frontal cause they wanted the scene to feel very realistic but the MPAA wouldnt budge cause showing a cock in a movie in a sexual situation automatically crosses the R rating.

This never changed. And probably wont.

---

Youre talking about those half second glimpses of their penis???? Most people didnt even notice it was shown. Its not even a full second.

---

A penis is a penis be it 10 secs or 10 mins and yes people noticed big time!
http://www.usatoday.com/story/life/entertainthis/2014/09/30/ben-affleck-does-full-frontal-nudity-in-gone-girl/77312602/

---

NPH was covered in blood from his death

---

Lets talk about that scene, his throat is slit mid sex and he bleeds on top on the woman, then when she checks he's dead, she pushes him out of her and you can see his penis post coital covered in blood!

That scene alone is enough to prove that a penis doesn't make a movie x rated!

When did we get to see Ben Affleck's penis?

---

Male frontal nudity would give it an X rating

---

There are 2 scenes with full frontal male nudity in Forgetting Sarah Marshall. It wouldn't give it an X rating in this. Also the "X rating" doesn't actually exist, it is NC-17 as the highest rating under MPAA. "X" rating is a made up rating for porn. The MPAA is G, PG, PG-13, R and NC-17.

There is no such thing as "X" under MPAA guidelines.

As for your Fast Times story, there could easily be a scene in this movie showing his junk without it being sexual. IE he hops out of the shower, fully nude, walks over and grabs a towel.

---

I have no idea why women watch

---

Sexual repression. Women aren't necessarily turned on seeing other men's dangling bits either. It is why women don't chase after strippers or typically want men to give them lap dances. Yes the clubs exist and yes women go to them, but it is a massive step down for them in social mindset to do so. They prefer the passion and pleasure, and this movie gives them that.

---

I wish the books would have been done properly

---

Agreed. I have met women who were seeking that kind of relationship simply because of the books, and I thought it funny because that wasn't how it worked.

Nope, I just saw it. You only see Jamie's butt like four times and his pubic hair, in the scene where he transfers 24,000 to Ana's bank account.

But of course he has a couple of semi nude scenes and Dakota has to show everthing plus be tied up? Have they forgotten this movie is meant to be aimed for women? ya think they learned from the first one!

No female frontal nudity i.e genitalia either It's just one of those films without genital nudity.


ITS TIME FOR THE MERKINS TO COME OFF, ITS TIME TO FREETHEVULVA!!
Please read my Bio.