Fifty Shades Darker : MPAA rating

Rated R for strong erotic sexual content, some graphic nudity, and language

Erotic, huh

So either they learned from the first and decided not to call the BDSM scenes unusual behavior or this one won't have any playroom sequences.

Second the some graphic nudity could mean we will get JD full frontal.

The graphic nudity is probably her!

''It was just like a movie. It was just like a song''

Christian is very much against going back into the REd Room..Ana is still curious, but warybut they do have lots of fun in his/their bedroom..they have lots of sexa lot..gets to the point where I turn those pages..but a lot more than the first movie, as the next two movies are about them being together, and nothing submissive/dominant about there sex life..a little of both for each

She didn't go full frontal in the last film , I shouldn't think she will in this film.
She wore a full patch and had CGI hair!

Jamie has said from the beginning that they would go for an R rating..NC 17 is banned in a lot of theaters.

Yes hopefully Dakota will take off the patch and she will be full frontal as well.

My gut feeling is it will like the first film , neither and a bit of cgi pubic hair.

ITS TIME FOR THE MERKINS TO COME OFF, ITS TIME TO FREETHEVULVA!!
Please read my Bio.

---

Yes hopefully Dakota will take off the patch and she will be full frontal as well.

---

Do you know how perverted that is to say that? Why are people so obsessed with butts and boobs and penis's and vagina's? They are body parts. You use them to function like you would any other body part. Stop acting like a bunch of immature kids who thinks it's funny to talk about these things and grow up.

100% in agreement , my only point is that if there is nudity there should be nudity equality. i.e penis = vulva , i.e not covered with a merkin or altered by CGI etc, The USA needs to grow up.
Having said that I cannot think of any instance where genital nudity would be required to any storyline or plot.

Exactlywould be interesting to find out how the sexes feel about total nudity in movies..and even with nudity, the porn movies I have attempted to watched on Cinemax late night were horribleget the woman naked when she walks in the front door..

Every 15 or 18 US comedy now comes with male genital nudity and penis jokes.
It's totally ridiculous.
The only way is to boycott them.

I agree.
Confirmed penis in this movie.
Such bs show penis and no vulva
Women are the biggest hypocristes ever lol

lol it hasn't been confirmed, it was explicitly denied The *beep* are you talking about?

really? jamie had a non nudity clause which he said he will not revoke, so he will never go full frontal & same with dakota..

which makes me wonder why cast people who wont be able to recreate 'scenes' from the book

Surprising the USA, has the biggest adult adult entertainment industry on the planet.

Just so everybody knows there was NO full genital nudity of either gender in this film! I know because I checked with the Canadian Film ratings (Specifically, the Alberta Film Ratings board at http://www.albertafilmratings.ca/searchf.aspx) and it is always specific and correct, unlike the stupid MPAA which has no objective standards. Usually, when the MPAA says "graphic nudity" it means full genital nudity or full frontal nudity and because of the pro-feminist sexist double-standard, that almost always means MALE genital nudity because the Hollyweird liberal studios don't feel its PC to show female genitalia, only male genitalia.

However. sometimes the MPAA will even call breast nudity "graphic nudity", which is a total joke. How can feminist women be declaring its their right to go topless in public like men in California, and then have breasts nudity get the highest "graphic nudity" label applied to it with an R-rating, while topless men gets no warning at all and can be passed with a G rating? The double-standards, hypocracy, and mental confusion of the liberals in California just boggles the mind.

In any case, the movie only shows topless and buttock nudity (non-genital nudity) of both the male and female characters. So the nudity in the film appears to be equal and balanced, although giving it a "graphic nudity" label is ridiculous.

insundling I send you a pm

It is never ever HER always HIM . Penis in every movieand no vulva ?
Boycott Seth Rogen, Boycott Paul Feig

sick to the back teeth you never see vulvas,clever camera work ensures it and if on tv they blur it out yet penises full view all the time. film after film it is sexist biased double standards, they have a real problem with female genitals and no feminists complains yet the film industry boycotts what a women was born with between her legs.

You've only got 17 more days to have a good cry about it here!

Men's full frontal nudity will never be equal to what women have been subjected to in Hollywood for years, so too bad!

genital nudity only is the argument here? men can show what they want women cannot how backward is that? it is like living like a Muslim where men dominate everything a women can do, same is happening in film women are banned from showing their genitals they were born with,s,they have been censored and your celebrating being told you cannot show what us men can. It is like being called a second class citizen or been told what you can and cannot do by your parents/teacher,you are laughing but your laughing at female genital censorship something us males can do in film FEMALES cannot.

---

you are laughing but your laughing at female genital censorship something us males can do in film FEMALES cannot.

---

Um no, there is no law or rule that female genital can't be shown, there is a thing called "choice" whether they want to or not!

I am for equality, always have been but it seems America and Australia ban the showing of female genitals which is inequality so to pass censors certificates film makers give up and don't include it in script.Maybe we need more female writers/directors/bosses who ban the penis and only vulvas allowed=girl power.. Fairs fair you women get an eyeful lesbians/straight males nothing. If I could go back to the beginning I would only allow genitals in R18 films in sex shops.

---

If I could go back to the beginning I would only allow genitals in R18 films in sex shops.

---

If you could go back, thats what you would do?
Not win the lottory or tip off the CIA to 9/11 or tell Hillary "Be careful with your emails".

If I could go back to the beginning with the film industry .

Who would want that? And no, he turned down the offer to do it. If you want to see that, you're a f*ggot

---

If you want to see that, you're a f*ggot

---

Proud to be one so!