Sully : Why no golden globes noms??
Re: Why no golden globes noms??
Clint Eastwood /recent election
Any questions? Lol
Any questions? Lol
Re: Why no golden globes noms??
Because it's a pretty average film. It's not bad, passed an hour and a half of my time and I always feel comfortable in the hands of both Eastwood and Hanks, but I wouldn't say it's award worthy?
What do you think it should have been nominated for?
What do you think it should have been nominated for?
Re: Why no golden globes noms??
Yes, Hanks is fine, but really, this is a "true story" movie and as dramas go, it isn't very compelling. Throw in the fact that Eastwood bizarrely decided to take a crap on the NTSB and I can see why it would be ignored by awards shows.
Re: Why no golden globes noms??
It's a bit 'TV movie' don't you think? A good one, with a massive *beep* budget, but TV movie nonetheless.
Why no golden globes noms??