Top Gun: Maverick : worst sequel ever? yes bc its so uncalled for and unneeded unnecessary

worst sequel ever? yes bc its so uncalled for and unneeded unnecessary

if there was a reason for it to be made then it would have been made 20 or 30 years ago.

so now you are left with a movie where everyone is so old bc its been over 30 years since the original that you cant even get anyone back except cruise.

so no val kilmer, no meg ryan and no kelly mcgillis.

they should have left it alnoe there are certain movies that are stand alone movies this is one of them but they fucked this up.

some move are so epically great that they cant and don't have a sequel bc they knwo that the sequel would be anywhere near as great as teh orignal nor would the remake. so neither a remke or sequel is made

the problem is nowadays from the '00s to now they(hollywood executives and directors and producers) don't know this rule in filmmaking so we get inferior sequels and remakes that shouldn't exist.

lukejbarnett

Re: worst sequel ever? yes bc its so uncalled for and unneeded unnecessary

Val Kilmer is supposed to be in this movie, you goddamn fucking dumbass.

We don't talk about Bruno! No, no, no!
Top