TV General : Would ratings on 90210 have declined even if series remained w/exact same cast?
Re: Would ratings on 90210 have declined even if series remained w/exact same ca
Scotty, Brenda, the parents and Gnat all left before the end of the series run, hana
Post deleted
This message has been deleted.
Re: Would ratings on 90210 have declined even if series remained w/exact same ca
I was talking about the original series “Beverly Hills 90210.”
Post deleted
This message has been deleted.
Re: Would ratings on 90210 have declined even if series remained w/exact same ca
Oh okay. Then why did Ian Ziering do Steve Sanders’ trademark tiger growl, if he and the cast were playing “themselves,” not their characters? Keep in mind this was NOT during those dream sequences (where the cast dreamt they were in character in bizarre episode of the original series) in beginning of every episode of the reboot). Instead, it was during a scene in which Ian was… Ian.
Also, in the pilot episode while they were on the private jet, Jennie called Tori out on her lack of brains. If I remember correctly, wasn’t Donna Martin the “slow” one of the gang? The writers didn’t put much effort into separating the cast from the characters, excluding in the pilot when Jason Priestley punched that guy who called him “the golden boy,” as Jason is only remembered as Brandon Walsh. Obviously that punch reflected his real-life beef with Harvey Weinstein. Well done, because Jason in real life was a “bad boy” and nothing like Brandon. But the rest of the reboot… meh.
Also, in the pilot episode while they were on the private jet, Jennie called Tori out on her lack of brains. If I remember correctly, wasn’t Donna Martin the “slow” one of the gang? The writers didn’t put much effort into separating the cast from the characters, excluding in the pilot when Jason Priestley punched that guy who called him “the golden boy,” as Jason is only remembered as Brandon Walsh. Obviously that punch reflected his real-life beef with Harvey Weinstein. Well done, because Jason in real life was a “bad boy” and nothing like Brandon. But the rest of the reboot… meh.
Would ratings on 90210 have declined even if series remained w/exact same cast?
Unfortunately, it’s a rarity for a television series to remain on top until its demise. One exception is “Cheers,” IMO. Do you think 90210 had enough stellar writing to not only last ten years with the same exact cast from season one (excluding Douglas Emerson), but also conclude with fanfare? Interestingly enough, exactly half of the original cast (again, excluding Douglas) was gone by the ninth season (not counting James Eckhouse and Carol Potter). Naturally, that is no bueno for a top-notch series. But what if nobody left?