Now Playing and Upcoming Films : Evidence professional film critics are reviewing movies with liberal bias!!

Evidence professional film critics are reviewing movies with liberal bias!!

I saw this movie on Netflix called Wish Man. It is about the man who founded Make-a-Wish foundation, but I didn't know that.

Not long in, I thought it was a Christian propaganda movie. The acting was bad, and the actors in here were all B-movie level. I was waiting for Kevin Sorbo to make an appearance. The production values looked like a made-for-tv Hallmark or Lifetime movie. It was poorly done. It had that "feel good" generic stock footage score tacked on to it, too.

I Googled Make-a-Wish to see if it was a Christian organization. It is not. I wasn't surprised though.

I was surprised this got above average reviews. Especially when movies with similar production values, same grade of actors, but have a theme of Christianity and/or conservatism, get poor reviews. God's Not Dead, Unplanned, Saving Christmas are examples of these.

The man who originally founded the idea is a Air Force vet and a police officer in rural Arizona in the 70s. So obviously he had some religious inspiration for it, but there are no references to Christianity in this movie.

As an objective critic myself, I've always found myself defending professional film critics, stating their critiques are based on the filmmaking and how the story is told: never on the social message itself, but how that message is distributed through filmmaking techniques (character development, narrative, avoiding cliches and contrivance). But sadly, I've learned this is not entirely the case.

Here is a review of Unplanned:

Unplanned will make you writhe in agony over how such an ugly, malicious and potentially dangerous piece of religious and political propaganda could have made its way into this world.

This has no place in a film review. Basically, this person just disagrees with the message.

This is another review of Unplanned:

said that while an ultrasound of a 13-week-old fetus may show a visible head and body, the notion that it would be "fighting for its life" is misleading.

Notice that he said its "misleading." Let's assume that's true. Whatever happened to suspension of disbelief? In Avengers Endgame, it's misleading that someone can disappear into dust and then reform again later on. MISLEADING! Yet, an unborn baby appear to fight for his life on a sonogram is "misleading" for this critic? LOLISMO!

Unplanned had one powerful scene that leaves you in tears. There's no teary-eyed worthy scene in Wish Man. It could've been, but was poorly executed.

Passion of the Christ, which had high production values and nowhere to the same the same level as a low-budget "propaganda" movie, has a 49% of Rotten Tomatoes only because it's about Jesus. Critics hate Jesus and movies about him for some unbeknownst reason.

If the Bible and Christianity never existed, and Mel Gibson himself created the Jesus mythology for Passion of Christ, then it would hailed as a masterpiece of cinema, because everything from the cinematography, to the acting, to the brilliant underrated score, to the inspirational ending where the score is timed just right, to the set design, and overall look, is a brilliant piece of filmmaking. But because Jesus is such a controversial character, and liberals have such animosity toward Christian mythology and Biblical adaptations, it unfairly gets critiqued through that filter.

Listen, Fahrenheit 9/11 and Bowling for Columbine are masterpiece documentaries. Even if you're a conservative NRA member and come out disagreeing with the message, you have to admit the pacing, the techniques (the animated cutaway) are fantastic and that Michael Moore is a talented documentarian.
Top