Politics : Politico poll: Trump would beat Lizzie Warren in 2020

---

Donald Trump begins his presidency facing unprecedented polling headwinds: Roughly a quarter of voters think he is the worst president in the past three-quarters of a century. Forty-three percent of voters are ready to vote for a nameless Democrat in 2020, while just over a third say theyll vote for Trump.

But, in the fourth week of Trumps presidency, a new POLITICO/Morning Consult poll shows that Democrats could be in trouble and Trump could triumph if they continue their lurch to the left.

Despite the publics increasing misgivings about Trumps behavior and tactics in the White House, he still beats Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) in a hypothetical matchup, 42 percent to 36 percent a fairly impressive margin for a less-than-popular president against the prominent senator.

The poll results from a survey conducted Feb. 9 and Feb. 10, just days after Warren was silenced by the GOP-controlled Senate for her criticism of now-Attorney General Jeff Sessions plainly show peril for both parties. Trump, for his part, has used the epithet Pocahontas to mock Warren, in a reference to her claims of Native American ancestry during her academic career.

---

http://www.politico.com/story/2017/02/poll-trump-democrats-elizabeth-warren-235026

Cue the cud-chewers who demand to know what right I have posting news about Fauxcahontas.

Cue the bed-wetters who decry the name Fauxcahontas.

Trump has a 10% ceiling. No wait, 20%, 25%, 30%, 40%, 45%, 49%, 50 %, 51%, etc

Liz Warren will not be the candidate.

I hope that's true. I can't imagine that the Bitch From Hell would be popular.




Goodbye

Cruella De Vil?




Goodbye

Imagine being less popular than Hillary!!!

Cory Booker can beat Trump. So can Kamala Harris. Young, fresh minority blood without the stress of being the "first" like Obama was. I can't wait.

Actors are useless without the power of a good writer's imagination

First they have to get the geriatrics out of the way.

You mean like Trump? He is older than all of them.

---

Cory Booker can beat Trump. So can Kamala Harris. Young, fresh minority blood without the stress of being the "first" like Obama was. I can't wait.

---

So you have absolutely no desire for there to be a left wing in US politics at all then, as long as the president isn't white? Same conservative politics but a darker shade of skin is OK for you? So you have absolutely no interest at all in what the next candidate's policy positions are, just as long as they aren't white? The US might as well just have Omarosa as the next president, if those are the only salient standards. Talk about summing up everything that's wrong with US politics in a single paragraph.

Would it get some wind for the sailboat? Would it get the railroad for these workers?

Trump will probably die before 2020.

He's fat and out of shape, in a very stressful job.


He's only going to get fatter and more out of shape.

It would be awesome if Trump and Warren fought in the octagon for the presidency

I would have loved to see Trump and Hillary fight.

Would probably be too close to call.

Yeah, you can tell that beneath her pantsuited, hyperfriendly facade, Hillary is a vicious beast of battle

It's not that I think Hillary is that tough, it's that I don't think there are too many women who couldn't give Trump a good fight.

Trump is big and tall, and quite mean himself.

Hillary is in better shape.

It would all depend on who ends up on the bottom in the first scramble.

Trump could pull off the win if he could get on top and use gravity for some ground and pound, but Hillary has sick leg kicks and that might hurt Trumps mobility.


Someone like Rosie O'Donnell would destroy Trump, but if he sticks to fighting aging smaller women he might have a chance.

Rosie is not small, and has a bad heart.

'Huuutch!' - Starsky

'Huuutch!' - Starsky

That was 20 years ago.

If Trump tried to do that today, he would need help to stand back up.

Hopefully this doesn't mean that the Democrats will cave in and field a right-wing candidate like Booker. It's rather worrying that people in the US seem to have no interest in having a liberal party. Perhaps because identity politics has poisoned the left wing in the US.

Would it get some wind for the sailboat? Would it get the railroad for these workers?

Here's Vanity Fair's advice.

---

Still, that activism doesnt appear to be translating into a broader base of support for Warren, who was long considered too left-of-center but now may not be considered progressive enough. The challenge for Democrats, as my colleague T.A. Frank notes in his recent, sobering assessment of the partys shallow bench, is to articulate a clear counter-narrative to Trumpism. And Warren, like other liberal leading lights, has so far failed to do so. Its easy enough to protest when youre in the minorityjust ask Republicans who thrived during the Obama yearsbut its another matter entirely to outline a coherent message of your own. Trump, for all his failings, was the only Republican in the 2016 field who seemed to know, unapologetically, what he stood for: banning Muslims, deporting undocumented immigrants, building a wall, knocking the hell out of ISIS. Hillary Clinton offered voters Stronger Together. Warren will have to dig deeper, and vocalize a more visceral economic narrative, if sheor any potential Democratic candidatewants to ride out the countrys ongoing populist realignment.

---

http://www.vanityfair.com/news/2017/02/elizabeth-warren-2020-poll-trump

"She persisted!"



Donald Trump for President 2016

People are starting to figure out that Warren is a fraud. Though she positions herself as a scrapper for the little guy she is in fact someone who made money on foreclosures, passed herself off as a Native American and turned her back on Bernie to support corporate shill Hillary.

Plus nobody can stand to hear her speak. Ouch!

So? That's not really saying much.



_____________http://tinyurl.com/gtb6nc2_____________

Trump is all done. Everything is breaking wide open fast

Someone feel free to repost this, edit to shorten it, whatever you think will make it appeal

After Trump, everyone will be using big data and saying what the majority want to hear.
Because for years now it's been aparrent for many the issues do not matter, the past acomplishments do not matter. It's whatever a person feels they can identify with and they stubbornly stick to it! After all these years!

One of the biggining factors in Trump winning had to do with Big Data. How many of you know of the billionares like the Mercers? And companys hired by Cambridge Analytics? Remember those dumb Facebook tests that give results on love life or psycology or tell you how or what kind of person you are? Well this is how dangerous big data is. Trump took Kerryanne and employed the company over too! Trump knew exactly what to say and how to appeal to people!

Feel free to repost this. I can never get anyone interested to reply enough to any posts. Trumpists refuse to learn anything new.

I got this from Louise from the UK who's done reporting on stuff that is important but for some reason doesn't go viral. Like the troll bots article she wrote and even used to Russian program and found the Russian trolls farms and the stuff the fbi report later revealed.

This is a very detailed but very boring. This was so accurate and this reminds me of years ago reading how much power google has and how much they know and can predict!
https://motherboard.vice.com/en_us/article/how-our-likes-helped-trump-win

"The American fascist
His method is to poison the channels of public information"

Didn't Politico say that Hillary would beat Trump?

Anyway, even if Tiny Hands Trump finishes first term no way in hell will the republicans nominate him for 2020.

Yeah. They're biased AGAINST him.