Nice ad-hominem faggot.
[center] [hr] [poll multiple] [s] [sic] [sub]2[/sub] [sup]th[/sup] [u]
This “scientific fact” you’re talking about is just pseudo-science peddled by charlatans.
There are plenty of examples of people actually having improved dexterity and judgement after drinking, you know nothing.
Lmao, the burden of proof is not on me faget.
What is apparent is that the results of those studies are distorted and abused by frauds to push “drunk driving” propaganda that ruins people lives for having a beer.
my point is that in reality, 99.999% of drunk drivers do not crash or kill someone else. Go ahead, prove me wrong. Why do both of us know for a fact you’ll never do this?
I do not have to follow the scientific method to prove to you that I will not crash into a building and explode after having a beer.
Actually the burden of proof is on you. I gave you a fact and you’re unable to refute it.
I already explained how the results of those studies are used as propaganda by organizations like MADD and the department of transportation, as well as the auto industry.
If it’s an “assertion” then prove it wrong fuckhead. That’s how the scientific method works.