Stacey Dash : Stacy Dash & Jada Pinkette are both useful idiots

neither of them have a clue about how Hollywood works, yet they both enjoy the perks of being part of it.

I agree about Jada Pinkett.

But where does Stacey Dash have it wrong? I think Stacey has said it rather well how it works.

Jada wants preferential treatment, Stacey said it should be on merit. What is wrong with what Stacey says?

Um Stacy said BET should be taken off the air because it shows preferential treatment to blacks. LOL what a dumbass of her to not understand how demographics and marketing work.

On top of that she's ignorant of the fact that BET is owned by a predominantly White-run Viacom conglomerate, so she should be complaining to Sumner Redstone about why she thinks Whites are being ignored on that network.

Her comments are as lame as any race-baiting "black activist" who spouts off about racism, or if someone complained about CMT channel not playing any black artists or featuring black actors.

Dash has had numerous roles on BET programs as well as graced the covers of many magazines who target the African American population. She has benefited a great from BET and the like. She probably hasn't been offered a role in a while and is trying to put out a political hit on them.

@Naughty God

Her comments are as lame as any race-baiting "black activist" who spouts off about racism,

Racism is real,dear, and it has a very real effect on people's lives, otherwise nobody would even be talking about it. Race is not a fckn game or card that people play just to get what they wantthat's not how it's ever worked,and especially not for black people. And, yeah, her comment about BET was ignorant, considering that if it wasn't for BET, she wouldn't have had any work at some point. BET got started because there were no cable channels or channels dealing with black people and their issues exclusively. So your comments are the typical lame ones of right-wing nuts who lack any understanding of what racism is and how it works.

And there's nothing "race-baiting" about talking about race-you make it sound like Black Lives Matters isn't talking about the very real issue of why black people are profiled,and shot more by the policethat's a fact, and a real issue. Don't try to blow off activists who are doing the real work of highlighting actually doing something about this issue and o16d0thers. Keep in mind, and the civil right activists were blown off the same way you're blowing them off by racist white folks in the South why did not want to them to have any voting rights. If race isn't an issue for you, finebut don't assume that just because it's not an issue for you, that it isn't an issue for other people. That's your big arrogance mistake right there.

And Pinkett isn't an "idiot". If anyone here besides me actually listened to her speak on the Oscar issue, she spoke very well about it and made some good points. Those who call her an idiot, but haven't even bothered to listen what she actually said are idiots themselves.

---

And there's nothing "race-baiting" about talking about race-you make it sound like Black Lives Matters isn't talking about the very real issue of why black people are profiled,and shot more by the policethat's a fact, and a real issue.

---

Actually that is NOT a fact. You are going by what you have seen on televisionwhat the liberal media wants you to believe. Statistics show that more whites are shot by police than blacks. The media just does not cover or highlight police shootings of white people because it does not fit their agenda. Black Lives Matter is nothing more than a band of anti-American thugs. They are anti-capitalism and pro Marxist-Socialist. They illegally block roadways and scream at people with their stupid chants about killing police officers.

---

Actually that is NOT a fact. You are going by2000 what you have seen on televisionwhat the liberal media wants you to believe. Statistics show that more whites are shot by police than blacks. The media just does not cover or highlight police shootings of white people because it does not fit their agenda. Black Lives Matter is nothing more than a band of anti-American thugs. They are anti-capitalism and pro Marxist-Socialist. They illegally block roadways and scream at people with their stupid chants about killing police officers.

---

This is the most absurd comment I ever seen in IMDb - and I saw many grotesque comments You start denying public numbers and end up accusing poor people that protest against violence of being communists. Is the whole package.

And BTW, you can dig at my history on IMDb that I'm no fan of a lot of things from the black activists on USA - like historical revisionism, muslin conversions and the list goes on But in this particular case you are ALL WRONG.

---

This is the most absurd comment I ever seen in IMDb - and I saw many grotesque comments You start denying public numbers and end up accusing poor people that protest against violence of being communists. Is the whole package.

And BTW, you can dig at my history on IMDb that I'm no fan of a lot of things from the black activists on USA - like historical revisionism, muslin conversions and the list goes on But in this particular case you are ALL WRONG.

---

It's obvious that you don't know what the Black Lives Matter group stands for. They want prostitution and illegal drug dealing decriminalized. They want all police forces abolished or at least demilitarized. They are also against capitalism. And they hold illegal protests that interrupts roadway traffic you have to get a permit if you want to hold a public protest! If anyone wants to protest anything I'm not one to block a protest, but they have to do it legally.

I'm not all wrong. You just need to remedy your ignorance before you start calling me out. Get your facts straight. Research Black Lives Matter. You will learn that they are an organization that is anti-capitalism. USA is a capitalist nation that is founded on freedom of religion and equal rights for all law abiding citizens. All lives matter. The US Constitution matters. Your post is ALL WRONG!

I don't even know where to start
Being in favor of descriminalize prostitution and drugs is not the same of being in favor of prostitution and drugs Many criminology scholars believe that descriminalization and strong regulation is a better strategy AGAINST prostitution and drugs than put poor people in jail, because you know, those are crimes of blue collar population. Curiously, people don't have so much intent to put on jail white collar criminals, but their crimes are much expensive to society as a whole
Anyway, Netherlands regulate drugs and prostitution and they are VERY capitalist, one of the historical top5, with USA, England, Belgium and Luxemburg.
Also, I do not understand how legalization of drugs and prostitution is related to communism, and to what kind of communism.

About your constitution, I know it very well, is based upon liberty. But to exercise your liberty you need access to primary goods, such as education, minimal healthy conditions, food We are talking about a community that was formed with sons of people who was taken from their homelands to force labor overseas! those guys live in Harlen but cannot study on NYU or Columbia, because recent black immigrants take all spots from affirmative action programs.

Of course they will fight back, run away, protest. Is human to fight back.

I also know the history of your public policies towards black people and the supreme court decisions, and I can say you have an amazing country, but the way black people still waiting for been included is one of the worst chapters in your history.

About your numbers, please

http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/ng-interactive/2015/jun/01/the-counted-police-killings-us-database

If you gonna try to really analise this, you should take the number of police kills for every thousand blacks and every thousand whites. Than we talk. Otherwis5b4e, it is like saying the death of 1,000 newyorkers have more impact on newyork than the death of 500 citizens of Riverwood, a city of 10,000 people

I can keep writing all day, but I think you already have my point: I was not guessing or talking without knowing the subject. I keep my opinion: you said a lot of nonsense and it was the worst comment I ever saw on IMDb.

Your statistics are wrong. According to this article more whites are killed than blacks by police:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/national/police-shootings-2016/

I will also add that blacks commit more violent crimes than whites as well. Many of them also use their protests as an excuse to loot and rob as well as destroy and burn buildings. I've seen it. There's no denying it.

Do the math:
If the whites are 72% of the USA population and the blacks are 12%, we have 6 times more whites than blacks
So, if the police kills two whites for every black, based upon the total population numbers of both groups you can say that 3 times more chance to be killed by the police
I will make it easy.

Lets create a number: 12 whites killed, and 6 blacks killed
6 blacks from 120 blacks are 5%
12 whites from 720 1,6%

And why do you think that is? Why are US prison populations made up of more blacks than whites? Your statistics are skewed. Blacks are not being targeted for their race. I agree there are some biased police officers who should not be police at all. But do you argue that blacks are committing more violent crimes, less, or equal to whites? Why do black men "knock up" their women then leave the women to raise their children in a struggling single parent household? If blacks would stop joining gangs, clean up their neighboods, concentrate on education, stop whining how the white man is keeping them down, they would achieve much more success in life. It seems there is some type of warrior mentality with most blacks. They are very combative. I try my best to be kind and show kindness to all, but rarely do I get a return smile when I pass a black person on the street or in a store. It has nothing to do with skin color; it is a mentality that holds them back.

Your last comment bring a lot of facts and some interpretation.
Your facts are right, but your interpretation don't reach the bottom of the question.
To reach that we can think about Obama. He is black, he becamda0e president.
So why some guy from Harlen cannot get clean, study and be great
This is the problem: Obama isn't from Harlen.
Truth is I don't know if he is from Harlen. Harlen here is a symbol. A symbol of the blacks who descend from slaves.
Obama is recent immigration. He's family came to America with values and costumes that made possible to him to achieve great things. Those are the blacks on the university these days.
The ones that descend from slavery had much more hard time to achieve great things. They culture is a culture of survival, of fighting oppression, of low self stem and fear.
Policies of inclusion fail to end this endless failure.
So, the problem here is the whining Is irritating, but it's not a choice.
They never had a choice. It's very difficult to win such uphill struggle.
I'm not talking about how society formally deal with you, but how society look at you and how society expect you to fail.
Also, I don't know if it's possible to social workers to help them to redefine families, but we should die trying.
The whole system works to keep than poor and ignorant, not by some villainous plan, but by indifference.
And violent crimes are typical blue collar crimes So it's natural to blacks to be more present in jail and police database.
What is not normal is to us to think this is natural.
If you think it is their nature, you believe and cognitive differences between whites and blacks, and this is a scientific absurd.
If you agree with me that it is a cultural problem, so we need to think about its roots.
And here is my problem: those roots have our finger prints, and anout the maintenance of this unfair scenario we only have ourselves to Blame.

First of all please look at this World IQ map and tell me your thoughts: http://www.devilsdictionaries.com/uploads/2/7/3/8/27389329/319972_orig.jpg

Why do so many of these African nations have lower IQs than other parts of the world?

Why has there never been a first world prosperous nation founded and governed by all blacks? And these blacks were never slaves in America.

The way you take care and feed the babies has a lot to do with the IQ.
The African continent never had a contemporaneous/industrialized developed nation, but they had Mali on middle ages and Ethiopia on ancient times as very developed nations. If someone ask this same question on 1600, we would said that Europe only had Greece/Bizantium and the long gone Rome as examples of development
We took advantage from the last four hundred years, but before that we had only two great nations/civilizations. If we gonna play the "great nation" game, middle east win by far, and look where they are now.
For last, part of Africa's today problems came from European interference. English, Spanish, Portuguese, French, Belgians, Dutch, Germans and even Italians create a lot of problem there because they reordered historical bounderies and create conflicts in order to dominate the continent more easily.
So, were Europeans dumb before 1600 and now are we very smart? No.
Now we are more organized and effective, just that.

BTW
Look at your map and think about it
Is the map of money
More money you have, more easily to get food and care to grant a fine cognitive development of children.
Look inside USA: http://www.longwood.edu/staff/hardinds/Politics/RedStates/AvgIQ.jpg

A map of Brazil would be similar, with southern rich states with high IQ and northern ones with low IQ. You just need to follow the money.
The theory of races is wrong. If it was right, eastern European nations would have better results than USA and Russia, that are multiethnic.
BTW, the data over Russia and China on your map is wrong Biased info leads to wrong conclusions

You should avoid Charles Murray interpretation of IQ distribution.
On 1200 the map would show Europe as a low IQ place
Again: feed and care.

Thanks for the link. Interesting information.

Unlike Rome, Italy or Athens, Greece, ancient Ethiopia and Middle Ages Mali never rose to be hegemonic powers. Are you saying that the reason for these nations and other more modern African nations never reaching hegemony, or becoming prosperous nations, is due to environmental conditions? Both Ethiopia and Mali had success in their times as did Rome and Greece. The difference is that Rome and Greece are still prosperous, Ethiopia and Mali are not. Were places like, Great Britain, Germany, Sweden, Japan, South Korea, and other first world nations just blessed with better land in order to provide for and "feed the children" as you say?

It's a fact that there are poor Eastern European nations that aren't as affluent as other nations founded by all whites. But I honestly can't think of one white nation that still lives like tribal people carrying spears and performing ancient (Stone Age) methods of survival. But that is the case in some of the African Nations. To me there seems to be something limiting their progress other than poor environmental conditions. There is an obvious shortage of food and drinkable water in many of those African nations, yet they continue to breed and bring babies into a world that is not fit for living. Instead of trying to improve their lives, they continue to breed, and in some parts of Africa, practice the savage act of circumcision on their young daughters. When whites colonized South Africa it achieved more success as a nation and is now consider Second World. Coincidence? I don't think so.

I didn't say anything about environment
When you have plenty of people, feed them is much more related to logistic than farming or good soil. I would guess that at least 1/3 of food production in the world is lost before reach final destination. You have better care and food when you are organized, not just because you have good soil.

About history
Greece itself was never hegemonic. They are the gate keepers of Europe, the hegemonic civilizations are their non-European neighbors. Rome was hegemonic and after its fall Bizantium kept strong for the next thousand years, but I would not say hegemonic
Mali was hegemonic. They did not expand north of Sahara by the same reasons no European nation went south of it before navigation d7ecevelop.
Ethiopia was strong and representative, as much as Greece on ancient times. The idea of Greece as a world power is Eurocentric. Greece's power was in culture and colonization, just like the Phoenicians, but no one said the Phoenicians were hegemonic. Other nations that absorbed their cultures were hegemonic later - Cartage and Rome. BTW, Greece is far from prosperous these days. They hold on because they are part of Europe. Italy is rich, always been, but prosperous isn't the best word. They have a society that has more money than quality in every aspect. This is their scenario since the Italian republics.
It's important to remember that technology spreads to neighbors
After the fall of Rome was Christianity that spread Roman some technology over Europe.
Asia had medicine, geometry, irrigation, chemistry and we were idiots with spears We got a lot with the middle east Then we develop navigation and everything changed 200 years later, small nations like Portugal and Netherlands were Empires.
Truth is Europe had Rome, then had the last 400 hundred years. Is very nice. We got big when societies got really complex. Is a fine achievement, but before that we are like Japan: bunch of barbarians fighting internal wars.
The atrocities against women in Africa are more related to Islamism than any "African" reason.
You need to consider geography when studying development. The sub-Saharan Africa was isolated. Ethiopia and Mali developed because they have contact with Mediterranean Africa and Arabic Peninsula. they were better, or at least at the same level of Europe in 1200, because hegemony was in the hands of muslins, especially the Ottomans. After that the map has changed.

About birth control, it's not a African problem India will be the most populated nation soon, and they are scientific advanced and poor nonsense, isn't it? Well, I not checked, but I guess that in general the poorest states of USA are the ones with highest numbers of bir5b4th by thousand
It is very complex to discuss birth control.

About South Africa, I find funny that you use second world
Second world was the communist world, and third are all the rest
I'm concern about the idea of BRICS been the new enemy of west, especially because this included not only Russia, but also South Africa and Brazil

Remember that Denmark was very poor a hundred years ago. I'm not kidding. Half of Iceland migrated to Manitoba to scape famine and half of Ireland went to America for the same reasons.

My state, the southern most of Brazil, receive a lot of Germans, Polish, Italians and Russians in the end of the XIX century.

And finally, for the last 80 years power isn't in Europe, but in Russia and USA, and yes, they are white, but they gain a lot with multiculturality. Truth is Texas and California are very distant from Europe and also better than Europe. Same thing with Novosibirski
Europe is the past, the new world is the future. Russia and USA became what they are when they decided to put Eurocentrism behind

---

I didn't say anything about environment
When you have plenty of people, feed them is much more related to logistic than farming or good soil. I would guess that at least 1/3 of food production in the world is lost before reach final destination. You have better care and food when you are organized, not just because you have good soil.

---

No you didn't say anything about environment. I was just asking if you thought that was a reason for black Africans' living in poverty in many of the African nations. You do say that poor planning of food distribution is a major cause for malnutrition and starvation in those countries. Isn't that their fault? Don't they have to be accountable for feeding themselves and the logistics of it? I say yes. No one is coming to aid improverished and starving whites. Blacks must find a way to rise up out of their slum conditions and make an effort to help themselves.

---

About history
Greece itself was never hegemonic. They are the gate keepers of Europe, the hegemonic civilizations are their non-European neighbors. Rome was hegemonic and after its fall Bizantium kept strong for the next thousand years, but I would not say hegemonic
Mali was hegemonic. They did not expand north of Sahara by the same reasons no European nation went south of it before navigation develop.
Ethiopia was strong and representative, as much as Greece on ancient times. The idea of Greece as a world power is Eurocentric. Greece's power was in culture and colonization, just like the Phoenicians, but no one said the Phoenicians were hegemonic. Other nations that absorbed their cultures were hegemonic later - Cartage and Rome. BTW, Greece is far from prosperous these days. They hold on because they are part of Europe. Italy is rich, always been, but prosperous isn't the best word. They have a society that has more money than quality in every aspect. This is their scenario since the Italian republics.
It's important to remember that technology spreads to neighbors
After the fall of Rome was Christianity that spread Roman some technology over Europe.
Asia had medicine, geometry, irrigation, chemistry and we were idiots with spears We got a lot with the middle east Then we develop navigation and everything changed 200 years later, small nations like Portugal and Netherlands were Empires.
Truth is Europe had Rome, then had the last 400 hundred years. Is very nice. We got big when societies got really complex. Is a fine achievement, but before that we are like Japan: bunch of barbarians fighting internal wars.

---

Nothing you said above answered my question as to why Greece and Italy maintained their successful status in the world, yet Mali and Ethiopia fell far behind. Of course at one time white cultures were primitive and not technologically advanced. Nor were the black Africans. But whites did develop and became civilized and advanced while the black Africans remained carrying spears and wearing bones through their noses. Even today they chop off the body parts of albino blacks and eat the human flesh because they believe it will give them powers. That notion is ridiculous and barbaric.

---

The atrocities against women in Africa are more related to Islamism than any "African" reason.
You need to consider geography when studying development. The sub-Saharan Africa was isolated. Ethiopia and Mali developed because they have contact with Mediterranean Africa and Arabic Peninsula. they were better, or at least at the same level of Europe in 1200, because hegemony was in the hands of muslins, especially the Ottomans. After that the map has changed.

---

The practice of female circumcision in Africa predates Islam. So what you said is false. Though Muslims have embraced the practice.
And I believe that Islam is evil. I've read enough of the Quran to know that I don't want any part of it.

---

About birth control, it's not a African problem India will be the most populated nation soon, and they are scientific advanced and poor nonsense, isn't it? Well, I not checked, but I guess that in general the poorest states of USA are the ones with highest numbers of birth by thousand
It is very complex to discuss birth control.

---

Yes. It's an African problem. Are you seriously comparing the birth control in Africa to poor states in the USA? That is a ludicrous comparison. Africans can't even feed or properly take care of their children by the thousands. America's situation isn't even close.

About birth control the comparison is valid, because is related to money and even between USA states you can see that.
I really don't know why you think Greece is fine today
We dominate the world for the last 400 years, before that we have only Rome as hegemonic power.
You have a very Eurocentric view, strongly biased.
Worst than that, you pick new points from what I am saying and just gave up the ones I already answer you.
I am a very patient guy, but your view of violence against blacks still absurd and you go on and on and now are justifying that arguing that African nations are miserable, so, black people situation of USA should be their own fault
You are wrong. It's not my opinion. This subject is uncontroversial between scholars.
Stop seeking blogs and sites. Pick the classics.
You can pick the libertarian ones or the conservative communitarians. Just stop guessing.

You ignored the points I made which are valid. But I'm not surprised. Nothing you've said has changed my opinions on this subject because nothing you said disproves my points.

Take for example this week Louisiana had devastating floods that killed 11 people. Keep in mind that this is a natural disaster of horrific proportions and many black families suffered. Yet during this disaster men took this as an opportunity to loot stores. Why do black people do this? I don't understand this mentality.

It's the same thing with the Los Angeles riots in the 1990s after the Rodney King verdict was announced. Blacks were angered because the police were found not guilty. Then they rioted. Not for social justice though. 5b4They broke into stores, looted, robbed, burned down parts of the city. It's like a bunch of savage animals. That kind of behavior makes no sense to me.

---

Yet during this disaster men took this as an opportunity to loot stores. Why do black people do this? I don't understand this mentality.

It's the same thing with the Los Angeles riots in the 1990s after the Rodney King verdict was announced. Blacks were angered because the police were found not guilty. Then they rioted. Not for social justice though. They broke into stores, looted, robbed, burned down parts of the city. It's like a bunch of savage animals. That kind o111cf behavior makes no sense to me.

---

Riots, looting and killing at various European and Latin American Football games. Ring a bell? Perhaps that recent Russian v England will refresh your mind. Gee what I don't get is why people who are suppose to be having fun need to have police with riot gear ready and waiting. Or *azi's using football games to garner votes. Oh and I forgot what about those Hockey games. Riots breaking up after Stanley Cup games. Again these are places people are suppose to be having fun? Get a answer for that before you try to understand anybody else's mentality.

Oh and about Stacy Dash. I agree she should be able to have her beliefs even if people disagree with them. But the problem with Dash is that she is being used as a tool and she is seems that she is just doing for the money. Hey it is just another acting job. There is various African American Conservatives, my mothers family is Republican and my Fathers very Liberal.. But she acts like the Drag Queen of the Republican Party. People who out do looking like a women and acting like a women. She tries real hard to out do the most Conservative of the Conservatives. And like Drag Queens she is a illusion. But unlike Drag Queens who appreciate and celebrate and love women she does it because of her self hatred and her hatred of black people.

No man, I answered your points, for an example, I showed you that your statement about whites as bigger victims of police action was wrong, because considering the total numbers of whites and blacks anyone can see that far more blacks are killed by groups of thousand, and this is the way you should work with numbers.
I also still waiting the reason why regulating prostitution and drugs are communist ideas, because far as I know they are common ideas between criminologists. Those are you initial statements that I criticized.
Then you went to birth control I told you is money relate and even in the USA you gonna see that the more poor and ignorant are the population of one state, higher will be the births in tb68hat state.
Same thing with IQ
Then you claim that African continent never had successful civilization Wrong again.
That Europe has a history of domination Wrong again, is recent
That Greece still rich and powerful Wrong again, they are broke and reduced to tourism
Then you started saying black people took advantage of critical situation to steal Yeah Only them, hein?
You still don't understand that this is only about money and education.
This is the same thing as I point to you that I'm smarter than you because I'm Jewish, and show numbers about how Jewish are smart and not involved in blue collar crimes, and then I just choose to not mention that by a "coincidence" almost all Jews are white collar people.
Do you see? This is exactly your argument.
Go on, loose your little mind Trumpeteer Boil your biased blood.
Find someone else to preach to, Mr. Goebbels.

I just have to guess at what you're typing because your English grammar is an abomination. I understand that Portguese is your first language, so I'll give you a pass.

It's difficult to know how to respond to your latest post because it's nothing more than a bunch of gibberish. I never said that decriminalizing prostitution and illegal drugs was communist related. I said that the group Black Live Matters wants to replace USA's capitalist economic system with Marxist Socialism. Black Lives Matters also wants to decriminalize prostitution and selling illegal drugs. I do not agree with these things that Black Live Matters supports. You do know that Black Lives Matters is an organization, don't you? It's not just a group of oppressed blacks.

Go research Black Lives Matters and discover it for yourself.

I don't know what "loose" your mind means. I think you meant "lose" your mind. It is pretty ridiculous that an idiot such as you would be so bold to as try to educate me. So fly away little birdy.

Dear Mr. Goebbels,
How luck I'm to have an educated hillbilly to teach me English, which is my 6th language, just behind all Latin ones and German.
Thank you for give me a pass! Some people would think you reach a new low by bringing the grammar card into the discussion, but I'm sure you did a honest move to help me, because it's something natural to the polyglots of the Bible Belt.
And you are right, I'm an idiot, I will drop the doctorate in Law to do something more adequate to my capacity, like study English to keep up with you. Maybe I should try out other things like creationism, Mein Kampf and The Art of a Deal.
I will call Howard University and tell them to close the doors. Your argument is just that strong! Now I know that black people are beyond help and education. I was even surprised that they organize themselves in stuff like organizations

It's funny that you assume I'm a hillbilly just because I have the word "Tennessee" as part of my username. I would say that it's a beautiful state, but I wouldn't want to encourage you to visit.

Your idiotic comparison of Goebbels to me is absolutely absurd. I love the Jews. My Savior is a Jew. I don't support genocide. I don't support racism. You know absolutely nothing about me. I do make careful observations, and I do get fed up with liberalism, encouraging white guilt and shifting the blame for blacks problems on whites.

I'm just curious about a different subject. What are your thoughts on Islam?

---

Racism is real,dear, and it has a very real effect on people's lives, otherwise nobody would even be talking about it. Race is not a fckn game or card that people play just to get what they wantthat's not how it's ever worked,and especially not for black people.

---

Nonsense. White Americans are the least racist people there is. If we even mention the "N" word or do something because of race we know we will get sued, fired, and be a huge outcast.

It's black people and their race hustlers Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton, and the Black Lives Matter thugs who are the new racists.

Don't tell me black people and their hustlers are not using past race sins and white guilt to play a game.

---

And there's nothing "race-baiting" about talking about race-you make it sound like Black Lives Matters isn't talking about the very real issue of why black people are profiled,and shot more by 16d0the policethat's a fact, and a real issue.

---

And why are they arrested more? Because as a percentage black people commit far more crime, especially against their own race.

And, yes, Pinkett was an idiot. She sounded like a whiny child, like just because of race that some black films should have been nominated.

That is funny, especially since Hollywood is the Liberal Capital of the world.

Better than being a useless idiot like you.

I take it then you are Spielberg or maybe someone even more successful in Hollywood- thank for joining us here on IMDB and pointing out those who have not been nearly as successful as you.