Life : This is NOT a Alien rip off.

This is NOT a Alien rip off.

Alien was called Alien. This is called Life. BIG difference! Like how Ed Sheerhan took Marvin Gayes song "Let's get it on" and merely changed the words and called it "Thinking out loud". Same thing here. If you change the words it is original! I was working on a movie that people said was just like Star wars, but I said incorrecto retardos. While my movie is about these rebels fighting an evil guy who wears a black helmet and a cape and uses a light sword and the rebels blow up his giant metal planet at the end, my movie was called "Space fight". Big difference from it being called "Star wars" so it is original.

Re: This is NOT a Alien rip off.

I think the title should have been Goodnight Moon.

~ the hardest thing in this world... is to live in it ~

Re: This is NOT a Alien rip off.

I have a strong strong feeling that it will be ALIEN with a hint of 2001: A Space Odyssey . Because thus far in 2017 - nobody ripped off 2001 yet (again).





















"The ENEMY of my ENEMY is my FRIEND"

Re: This is NOT a Alien rip off.

Interstellar ripped off 2001, horrendously. What is it with Hollywood and terrible, pseudo-intellectual but overly pandering crap sci fi movies recently? (passengers, interstellar, the martian). I agree this should have been called "goodnight moon" because then it wouldn't have the most generic title ever. I'm trying to find ANYTHING that shows this film as being a non alien rip off, but it clearly is in every way. Although, with less believable characters and a tacked-on "i'm a daddy now" subplot

Re: This is NOT a Alien rip off.

What was wrong with The Martian?

Interstellar is really overrated but I wouldn't call it a terrible movie (and it didn't get as high of a reviews as it could've gotten, because of some flaws).

Passengers didn't get the best reviews and isn't considered to be so good, so you're correct on that one. However, that movie is a really big waste of potential. With some tweaking we could've gotten something like Psycho and Solaris combined. That's the closest I can compare such a waste of potential. I want that movie to be remade.

Also, I strongly disagree that Interstellar ripped-off 2001 that strongly. It's obviously inspired by that movie, yes. It's a homage, but apart from some visuals etc., they're very, very different movies.

Wall-E has more similarities to 2001, than Interstellar.

Re: This is NOT a Alien rip off.


What was wrong with The Martian?
Visually it was almost flawless. But from a script POV it was so pandering and phoney. It was clearly a film made to appeal to the idiotic masses who don't care about science, but instead watch youtube vids of balloons popping in slow motion and go "OMFG I TOTES LOVE SCIENCE LUL!"

The dialogue was so inauthentic and so was the supposed "banter" between the people on the rescue spaceship. Also, "In your face Neil Armstrong" and "I have to science the S*** out of this" are 2 of the most pandering lines in film history. Unfortunately, Hollywood prefers to make huge spectacle sci-fi like Martian and Interstellar, but then they go and add all these simplistic and one-dimensional scripts and dialogue to the films which spell out everything for the audience. Great Sci-Fi like 2001 or Primer or Alien doesn't do this. From the trailer of "Life" it looks like it also misunderstands that Less Is More. It's fascinating when the "space Jockey" isn't explained, yet "Prometheus" is just dreadful it over-explains everything so idiots can keep up. Same with all these other films.

Wall-E was the best of those movies (The first half is considered a masterpiece, because nothing was over-explained and pandering) Because it was the least arrogant and smug.

Re: This is NOT a Alien rip off.

It's not an Alien ripoff.


Top