Jennifer doesn't like people staring at her naked, and has declared that you are a sex offender if you have seen her pictures.
Try quoting her saying this in her own words. Good luck with that.
“It is not a scandal. It is a sex crime,” the Oscar-winning actress told Vanity Fair in her first public comments since her pictures appeared online earlier this year, alongside those of supermodel Kate Upton, teenage Olympic gymnast McKayla Maroney and other celebrities.
“The law needs to be changed, and we need to change,” she added. “That’s why these websites are responsible.
Well, from Variety:
Sounds like she is trying to absolve herself from any responsibility in taking pictures like that to being with.
Seems more like she is angry that she was caught, rather than actually interested in having the laws changed.
I do not recall her asking for this type of a change during the earlier parts of her career. Why only the sudden interest after she was exposed?
At no point in your quote does she say that looking at the pictures is a sex crime.
She has nothing to apologize for or "take responsibility for"
since there was nothing wrong with any of it
Earth to Final Hiccup: it is human nature to not think about or pay attention to certain types of criminal events until they happen to you or a loved one
Read the article. I only posted the highlights for you to enjoy.
She does not need to apologize, but she should have never tried to place the blame on ANYONE but her own self for not only agreeing to take those photos, but keeping them afterwards.
Sex Trafficking is illegal in most cities, counties and states in America.
You literally just admitted that Jennifer did not consider the consequences nor the ramifications for taking part in such antics and therefore is fully responsible.
To claim that she was unaware of this type of action from happening is absurd, considering that she grew up in an age were Paris Hilton had a sex tape leaked, as did Kim Kardashian and many other celebrities.
Just when I thought you couldn't make an even bigger fool out of yourself, you went ahead and demonstrated that your claims continue to be baseless.
The fact still remains that you cannot and will not find her saying, in her own words, the belief you falsely attributed to her.
In the interview, Lawrence expresses a sense of anger and violation not just with the hackers but people who chose to view the images, accusing them of also committing a crime. “Anybody who looked at those pictures, you’re perpetuating a sexual offence. You should cower with shame.
How much time have you spent condemning the hackers here rather than implicating her in something nefarious?
Taking erotic photographs for your boyfriend is not sex trafficking
No, only a knuckle dragging, unethical half wit troll would think that.
Her account was password protected and advertised as secure.
Thankfully, your disgusting presence on this board will be no more in just a few days.
You were saying?
I am not defending the hackers, but am merely stating if you do not willingly take photos of that nature then there is nothing of yours to be exposed.
They were not for her boyfriend, those photos were not selfies.
Also the reason why she lost her fight with 4chan is because they were not her photos and she did not have the rights to them.
Is this the type of "heated but civil" discussion that goes on at your safespace board?
Yet she did not secure her icloud account.
Maybe you should get out a dictionary and look up what the word “perpetuating” means.
This is the moral equivalent of saying, “If you didn’t buy expensive jewelry, it wouldn’t be there for robbers to steal.”
That they obviously aren’t selfies has nothing to do with anything.
They were her photos and they were illegally stolen.
Worthless maggots like you don’t post on that board and therefore don’t draw harsh criticism.
It was hacked, idiot. That’s the equivalent of a robber picking a lock.
You were PROVEN WRONG with FACTS and still cannot admit that you were wrong.
Robbery of tangible goods is now the same as naked pictures posted online?
And if they were "for her boyfriend", it means that he didn't take them either.
So who took them??? The casting couch is calling...
Her requests by her lawyers were denied, since she was not the owner of the images, hence why they are still available today.
Once again, no naked photos... no issue of them being exposed!
Actually, I wasn't proven wrong.
Yes. The guy is serving jail time for it, idiot.
consider that a friend might have been involved. Or a personal assistant
That's just your sick imagination.
I asked for a citation from a mainstream news source to back up this claim
Once again: your moral illiteracy and basic nature as a worthless scumbag
Yes you were, and you are just TRIGGERED and once again denying FACTS to try and save face, it won't work.
You seem to think that all crimes are the same.
You have your friends take naked pictures of yourself so that you can send them to your boyfriend?
Literally, take a step back and think clearly about what you just proposed.
I do not have an obsessive obsession with Jennifer like you do, therefore it is not in my interests to fantasize about Jennifer on the casting couch.
Every time FACTS are provided to you, you deny them.
What would work is you quoting her saying that people who looked at her photo's were sex offenders, in her own words.
He stole her pictures. He's doing time for it. Get a clue, idiot.
She has said these pictures were for her boyfriend (she has also said that a requirement for any personal assistant is a comfort level with nudity).
It is obviously in your interests to have these fantasies, since you post about them in a public space for anyone to see.
Like the time I admitted I was wrong about the Passenger's BO compared to other 2016 movies?
The link was provided, twice.
What does that have to do with a jewel thief you were talking about?
You literally said that one of her friends may have taken the pictures of her that were "intended for her boyfriend".
Yes, and at no point in that link does she say that anyone who looked at her pictures is a sex offender.
Yes, she does.
Hence why you made up some baseless claim that her friends took naked pictures of herself in a hotel room.