Superman II : Why only 6.8?

Why only 6.8?

The movie has a lot of cheesy stuff in it and a few nonsensical parts, but this is a great superhero film. In some respects it surpasses the original, a classic in its own right. I know I'm not alone in this sentiment. I'm curious, why do you think it's IMDB rating is under 7?

Re: Why only 6.8?…

, it's my favorite and I feel the best superhero film ever produced. Both the Lester and the Donner versions. It should be at least 8.8 (two full points higher than its IMDb rating).

Well, most people are idiots with bad taste...so there!

Re: Why only 6.8?

There's been a steady ratings decline since the release of the awful "Donner cut."

A re-mastered original Superman II (1981) would be light years better and show young people the brilliant film audiences saw in the theater back in 1981.

One may admire Donner for his work on the 1978 film, while admitting he really screwed up Superman II with his hatchet job in 2006. Shades of George Lucas and "Star Wars: Special Edition."
Top