Roman Polanski : Haven't posted on here for a while, gotta question…

---

Had it been a rape charge

---

Did I ever say it was a rape charge, you stupid *beep* I said he raped her because she could not consent to sex with a 44 year old man. What he pleaded to is different. That is part of the judicial process. Most people plea to some lesser charge to save the court time and money and to spare their victims from having to relive the attack by testifying.

Now, why don't you be a good little tw@t and address this?

---

by prometheus1816 18 hours ago (Tue Feb 7 2017 11:37:33)
IMDb member since July 2001
Don't take it out on me, tw@t. Rascal is the one who disagrees with you. You two should take your tampons out and have a fight about it.

I'll take whatever the hell I want out on you because you've been denying that Samantha lied for at least a year and a half. Rascal doesn't disagree with me, he believe5b4s like I do that Samantha the Nympho lied.

---

You WANTED IT TO BE A RAPE CHARGE YOU STUPID JUSTAMORON, JUST TO PROVE HOW RIGHT YOU THINK YOU ARE, WHEN YOU ARE THE MOST MISGUIDED, EMOTIONALLY REDUNDANT AND DENSE POSTER ON THIS ENTIRE DATABASE.

Polanski wasn't charged with rape, because HE DIDN'T rape her and there was NO SOLID evidence to back up a rape case either. Geimer shouldn't have been so slutty and throwing herself around by lying to older men about how old she was. She liked the attention men were giving her AND SHE WANTED FOR THEM TO HAVE SEX WITH HER, being the little nymphet that she was. POLANSKI DIDN'T THINK HE WAS DOING ANYTHING WRONG ILLEGALLY, and unless she "honestly" admits to how old she told Polanski she wasthat is if her age2000 was even brought upand Polanski announces how old he "honestly" thought she wasthat is if he even knew and stupidly allowed himself to be misled thinking she was an older teen at the top end of the age scalethere is nothing you can say or do from a legal pov, TO PROVE THAT POLANSKI RAPED GEIMER. It is only in your own SICK MIND, due to your RAPE OBSESSION, that you want to turn it into something it wasn't. It DOESN'T matter that she was only 13, she legally couldn't have sex with older men over 18the boyfriendand consent is a moot point, because she COULD STILL CONSENT TO SEX, she just SHOULDN'T have consented knowing her own real age. Geimer wasn't a mentally deficient moron like you, and was smart enough and sharp enoughunlike youto still take on responsibility for her actions. SHE WAS EXPERIENCED. Could she consent to having sex with someone around her own teen age moron?

Gailey and Geimer were schemers, and she was made out to be the little victim and she played up on this with her LIES. GET IT!

Don't eat the whole ones!Those are for the guests.

---

because HE DIDN'T rape her and there was NO SOLID evidence to back up a rape case either.

---

---

POLANSKI DIDN'T THINK HE WAS DOING ANYTHING WRONG ILLEGALLY

---

She was too young to consent, therefore it was rape. Either way, thank you for establishing "sexual contact" between the two. I wonder when promethedumbazz will chastise you for it?

And, it doesn't matter if pedo polanski didn't think he was doing anything wrong. He was.

---

It DOESN'T matter that she was only 13, she legally couldn't have sex with older men over 18

---

You finally got something right, and that means you agree she was raped by every man who was 18 or older, including pedo polanski.

---

SHE WAS EXPERIENCED.

---

Irrelevant to the rape.

---

Could she consent to having sex with someone around her own teen age moron?

---

Yes, d!ck lick. How hard is that to understand?

---

she played up on this with her LIES.

---

How is it a lie if you admit there was sexual contact between her and pedo polanski?


Sh!t you are stupid

Typical moronic response that I had anticipated from you justamoron. From somebody who will take a smidgen of a sentence and then twist it around to make it about themselves. Way to miss the point you mentally ill narcissist and disregard the bigger picture moron. What don't you understand about the LIES that were told by Geimer about what really happened? Polanski didn't lie, he admitted to having SEX with her. Her mother threw her daughter at Polanski and was dishonest and scheming, Geimer would have LIED constantly to get the attention she so desired from older men, and her story doesn't quite add up compared to witness accounts and what she told the grand jury. I haven't read her opportunist booknot interested in a LIARS accountso therefore not interested in her deceit. Please explain to me the deceit of Polanski, who did everything that was asked of him, regarding the evidence THAT STACKED UP "AGAINST" A RAPE CASE REGARDING GEIMER.

Like Prom commented, A "TRAUMATIZED" RAPE VICTIM DOESN'T KEEP IN CONTACT WITH HER ASSAILANT.

Don't eat the whole ones!Those are for the guests.

---

Polanski didn't lie, he admitted to having SEX with her.

---

But Promethedumbazz says he didn't. Which is it? Can't you pedo's get your story right?

Of course he admitted to it. Where does Prom claim he didn't. That was the charge he pleaded guilty to, unlawful sex with a minor. It doesn't take a brainiac to figure this out, otherwise he would have pleaded not guilty to that charge as well. Duh! Having sex with a lying minor, who claimed she wasn't a minor, isn't rape fool.

Don't eat the whole ones!Those are for the guests.

promethedumazz claims there is no proof.

---

Having sex with a lying minor, who claimed she wasn't a minor, isn't rape fool.

---

Yes it is, d!ck breath. Using your sh!t headed logic, a woman who is drunk but lies and says she isn't drunk would exonerate you from rape charges. It doesn't work that way. Neither are able to give consent to sex. A 13 year old CANNOT consent to sex with a 44 year-old.

What an absolute creepy moron you are. Drunk or not, RAPE STILL HAS TO BE PROVEN. What if the male is drunk too, can he give consent to sex? What a d!ck lick you are, s<>t for brains! And yes, a 13yr old can consent moron. They are just not legally allowed too. Geimer shouldn't have been lying about her age either and PRETENDING to be a mature woman. POLANSKI DID NOT PLEAD GUILITY TO RAPE, AND WITH THE CONTRADICTICTORY EVIDENCE DUE TO THE LIES THAT WERE TOLD, RAPE WOULD HAVE BEEN DIFFICULT TO PROVE F<>KSTICK!

Don't eat the whole ones!Those are for the guests.

You know Mr. H, I find it incredibly disturbing the attitudes that many take over Polanski's sexual encounter with Gemier, when many find his actions incredibly disturbing, yet they appear to absolutely clueless and dismiss the many shades of grey involved. It is disturbing, because we still live in a world of redneck, lynch mob mentalities,and the truth gets discarded for the sake of condemning and keeping others down. It makes me wonder, if they only do this to avoid looking at themselves and their own perversions, and project it onto others, to make themselves look better in the eyes of others and avoid their own suffering and insecurities.

Don't eat the whole ones!Those are for the guests.

---

And just why is it that some people are so much more eager to be outraged about this so-called escaping justice than they are able to feel outrage about the Holocaust (if they even are aware that he lived through it) or the Sharon Tate massacre.

---

Only retards "think" that people aren't outraged at all of it. Only sh!t-stained retards "think" that him surviving the Holocaust and having his family murdered excuses anything else he ever did.

---

"Yes, it does! It absolutely does! What happened to Roman Polanski gives him carte blanche to do whatever he wants to do!"

---

I wonder how you'd feel if he raped your 13 year old daughter and then, just for fun, killed your wife.

---

And I say all this only with the total sense that Roman Polanski fundamentally has a good heart. I would not be so fanatical if it weren't my own impression that there wasn't sweetness and kindness and gentleness and warmth in this person.

---

Besides the whole drugs & rape thing, right?

Samantha Geimer has little care for seeing Polanski punished. She in fact has campaigned openly to have the case closed and Polanski exoneratedGeimer wouldn't know adversity if it hit her in the face.
_______________________

I'd also say that poor victim Geimer wants Polanski exonerated, because if he ever did return to the US to face "so-called" US justice, all of the Numbys of this world that insist on Polanski being a filthy pedophile and perverted creep, might end up having to eat humble pie. It would suddenly become big world wide news, the case would be re-visited and a new can of worms would be opened. This time, Geimer would have to face adversity which she wants to avoid. The whole truth would have to be told "officially" and culture shock would prevail. But then again, people will still believe what they want too, and they would still be demanding Polanski's head on a pole regardless. The justice system cannot fail them and if it does, it would lose all credibility. Polanski is safer off where he is, and I doubt the US legal system really wants him back, due to where they failed him and themselves.

Don't eat the whole ones!Those are for the guests.

---

I'd also say that poor victim Geimer wants Polanski exonerated, because if he ever did return to the US to face "so-called" US justice, all of the Numbys of this world that insist on Polanski being a filthy pedophile and perverted creep, might end up having to eat humble pie. It would suddenly become big world wide news, the case would be re-visited and a new can of worms would be opened. This time, Geimer would have to face adversity which she wants to avoid. The whole truth would have to be told "officially" and culture shock would prevail. But then again, people will still believe what they want too, and they would still be demanding Polanski's head on a pole regardless. The justice system cannot fail them and if it does, it would lose all credibility. Polanski is safer off where he is, and I doubt the US legal system really wants him back, due to where they failed him and themselves.

---

One thing Geimer is totally afraid of, and that is if Polanski did come back and withdraw his plea and force a trial. how many times would Geimer, Susan Gailey, David Wells, Boyfriend Bob, and others in this whole case have to plead the fifth against self incrimination? I personally don't believe the case would open a whole new can of worms. People already have their beliefs about him. They wouldn't care if a new "trial" did exonerate him. I mentioned the case of Steven Avery and Brendan Dassey. People still believe they raped, murdered and burned the body of Teresa Halbach and don't care about the evidence that points to both their innocence. All the know is that those two brutes raped and murdered her, no care as to whether the evidence supports it. Same with Polanski. None of the evidence supports Geimer, but that doesn't matter. Polanski is a pedophile and as another thread on this board has deemed him worthy, "Kill this child rapist".

Sometimes my ruminations arb68e too confusing for someone not inside my head. -Anon

One thing Geimer is totally afraid of, and that is if Polanski did come back and withdraw his plea and force a trial. how many times would Geimer, Susan Gailey, David Wells, Boyfriend Bob, and others in this whole case have to plead the fifth against self incrimination?
________________

Well, I suppose that was part of my point, that it wouldn't make them out in the best of light regardless.


People already have their beliefs about him. They wouldn't care if a new "trial" did exonerate him None of the evidence supports Geimer, but that doesn't matter. Polanski is a pedophile
_________________________

I suppose if people want to go through life with their head1c84s buried in the sand and act all pious and ignorant, I suppose we need to have some compassion for them. It's just that it can be very exhausting attempting to placate and pander to numbnuts that wouldn't know the truth if it hit them in the face at full throttle speed. I guess when people are deeply asleep and lack self-awareness, they have no choice but to go through life numb and dumb.


Don't eat the whole ones!Those are for the guests.