Logan : None of you anti-MCU Fox's Marvel fans liked the Wolverine solos
Re: None of you anti-MCU Fox's Marvel fans liked the Wolverine solos
Didn't ask you chump you are the only one who says Civil War is trash comic. 25k people say otherwise
25,000 Out of a population of a hell of a lot bigger after 10 yearsisn't much.
Re: None of you anti-MCU Fox's Marvel fans liked the Wolverine solos
Better than your single opinion
Re: None of you anti-MCU Fox's Marvel fans liked the Wolverine solos
It's not a single opinion, if you bother looking.
Re: None of you anti-MCU Fox's Marvel fans liked the Wolverine solos
You actually thought the heroes were going out to fight to the death?
Re: None of you anti-MCU Fox's Marvel fans liked the Wolverine solos
Did you read Civil War comic, kid?
Re: None of you anti-MCU Fox's Marvel fans liked the Wolverine solos
You expected a rip-off from the comic?
Re: None of you anti-MCU Fox's Marvel fans liked the Wolverine solos
I expected a similarity. Not fantastic Four and X-men appearance.
Something, Like Days of Future Past which is Best Comic Book Adaptation in CBM.
That proves my initial point that Marvel is ashamed of Comics.
Something, Like Days of Future Past which is Best Comic Book Adaptation in CBM.
That proves my initial point that Marvel is ashamed of Comics.
Re: None of you anti-MCU Fox's Marvel fans liked the Wolverine solos
DOFP wasn't that good. It just had an artificial boost from Singer coming back and the old cast coming back for some silly fairytale ending.
Post deleted
This message has been deleted.
Re: None of you anti-MCU Fox's Marvel fans liked the Wolverine solos
That doesnt change the fact that he got injured in a "war"..
Please, if you had already googled the word then you know that being killed, injured or accident in war constitutes to casualties.
And wait a minute, how do you know Rhodey will be in Infinity War? Because he's not in the casting list and if he's not actually in it then your statement that "Civil War had no casualties" will still be meaningless and you're gonna feel like a jackass but I wont be there to see it because IMDB message boards will long gone by then, so you'll be lucky..
Please, if you had already googled the word then you know that being killed, injured or accident in war constitutes to casualties.
And wait a minute, how do you know Rhodey will be in Infinity War? Because he's not in the casting list and if he's not actually in it then your statement that "Civil War had no casualties" will still be meaningless and you're gonna feel like a jackass but I wont be there to see it because IMDB message boards will long gone by then, so you'll be lucky..
Re: None of you anti-MCU Fox's Marvel fans liked the Wolverine solos
That doesnt change the fact that he got injured in a "war"..
Injured so he can be War Machine Again? That doesn't change any character dynamic, not even a bit.
Please, if you had already googled the word then you know that being killed, injured or accident in war constitutes to casualties.
Because not every soldier gets an "exoskeletal leg braces" from government, kiddo!
And wait a minute, how do you know Rhodey will be in Infinity War? Because he's not in the casting list and if he's not actually in it then your statement that "Civil War had no casualties" will still be meaningless and you're gonna feel like a jackass but I wont be there to see it because IMDB message boards will long gone by then, so you'll be lucky..
Please!! Do you really think War Machine won't be in Infinity Wars? Ask yourself twice!
Re: None of you anti-MCU Fox's Marvel fans liked the Wolverine solos
Please!! Do you really think War Machine won't be in Infinity Wars? Ask yourself twice!
Even if he's in it fighting alongside the heroes your "Civil War had no casualties" statement will still be meaningless because Rhodey got accidentally injured in Civil War which, again, constitutes to casualties..
Even if he's in it fighting alongside the heroes your "Civil War had no casualties" statement will still be meaningless because Rhodey got accidentally injured in Civil War which, again, constitutes to casualties..
Re: None of you anti-MCU Fox's Marvel fans liked the Wolverine solos
Oh My God! Injury is casualty in War coz soldiers don't get "exoskeletal leg braces" from government. They are unable to fight, which in case of War Machine is Untrue.
Re: None of you anti-MCU Fox's Marvel fans liked the Wolverine solos
The point is that Rhodey got hurt in the "war" kiddo= casualties.
Re: None of you anti-MCU Fox's Marvel fans liked the Wolverine solos
kiddo= casualties.
Thank you for proving my point that you are a kid.
And go read about wars.
Re: None of you anti-MCU Fox's Marvel fans liked the Wolverine solos
No I dont need to kiddo but you have a problem with the nuances of the English language.
Re: None of you anti-MCU Fox's Marvel fans liked the Wolverine solos
How come War turned into a Airport brawl is improvement.
Comics Civil War relied on pretty much every character being OOC just for the sheer sake of fighting. The movie version didn't.
Not making jokes through fight on face of enemies,
They made jokes to remind each other that they WEREN'T really enemies and no one wanted it to come to this.
War has causalities this had NONE.
The comic version hardly had any real harm done either. No, Cap didn't die in Civil War comic version, that's a misconception.
Logan improved Old Man Logan comic.
Doubtful.
Re: None of you anti-MCU Fox's Marvel fans liked the Wolverine solos
Comics Civil War relied on pretty much every character being OOC just for the sheer sake of fighting. The movie version didn't.
So they were ashamed of comics, Thank you for proving my point on first attempt!
Re: None of you anti-MCU Fox's Marvel fans liked the Wolverine solos
Nothing wrong with fixing a bad story.
Re: None of you anti-MCU Fox's Marvel fans liked the Wolverine solos
It's a great story. Just coz you say "it's bad story" doesn't make it otherwise
Re: None of you anti-MCU Fox's Marvel fans liked the Wolverine solos
Most fans and critics agree that Civil War, in comic book form, has several problems, both as its own story and for how it affected the Marvel universe afterwards (see Spider-Man: One More Day).
Re: None of you anti-MCU Fox's Marvel fans liked the Wolverine solos
Most fans and critics agree that Civil War, in comic book form, has several problems
Initially, Yes. It received polarized reviews. But in coming years it has been regarded as one one best storylines, even IGN acknowledged that.
There are several movies which received polarizing reviews but are regarded as one of the best movies like Blade Runner.
Even various readers vote it as one of the best.
http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/91714.Civil_War
http://comicbookroundup.com/comic-books/reviews/marvel-comics/civil-war/1
You guys can cry all you want but Civil War was very good Storyline. And we will never see such storyline in movies not in 15 years atleast.
Re: None of you anti-MCU Fox's Marvel fans liked the Wolverine solos
Doing it in movie form wouldn't be feasible anyway.
Re: None of you anti-MCU Fox's Marvel fans liked the Wolverine solos
It should have been in Phase 5, As I said it was ashamed of Comics. But,
http://www.cinemablend.com/new/Batman-V-Superman-Actually-Helped-Marvel-Realize-Civil-War-Was-Right-Call-127537.html
Not my words
http://www.cinemablend.com/new/Batman-V-Superman-Actually-Helped-Marvel-Realize-Civil-War-Was-Right-Call-127537.html
Not my words
Re: None of you anti-MCU Fox's Marvel fans liked the Wolverine solos
It was pretty bad, especially that garbage about how Cap was out of touch because he didn't have a MySpace account.
Or how it needed characters to be totally OOC for the sake of fighting.
Or how it needed characters to be totally OOC for the sake of fighting.
Re: None of you anti-MCU Fox's Marvel fans liked the Wolverine solos
Because you say so
Atleast 25k people think otherwise
http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/91714.Civil_War
Atleast 25k people think otherwise
http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/91714.Civil_War
Re: None of you anti-MCU Fox's Marvel fans liked the Wolverine solos
25K people, not that much of a figure after 10 years.
Re: None of you anti-MCU Fox's Marvel fans liked the Wolverine solos
Better than 1
Post deleted
This message has been deleted.
Re: None of you anti-MCU Fox's Marvel fans liked the Wolverine solos
Re: None of you anti-MCU Fox's Marvel fans liked the Wolverine solos
He still can fight and is a War Machine, so yeah NO
Re: None of you anti-MCU Fox's Marvel fans liked the Wolverine solos
He isn't dead, so yeah NO
No, You said there was no casualties, you know? casualties. In war being killed or injured constitutes to casualties, Rhodey got seriously injured.
http://www.reactiongifs.com/r/2013/07/stupid.gif
No, You said there was no casualties, you know? casualties. In war being killed or injured constitutes to casualties, Rhodey got seriously injured.
http://www.reactiongifs.com/r/2013/07/stupid.gif
Re: None of you anti-MCU Fox's Marvel fans liked the Wolverine solos
NoLANIST has a problem with the nuances of the English language.
Re: None of you anti-MCU Fox's Marvel fans liked the Wolverine solos
You know what happens when soldiers get injured in a War? They stay injured and can never participate in any other War. They don't get exoskeletal leg braces to be soldier again.
There are certain requirement and criteria for soldiers too. Or you can watch First Avenger for further information.
There are certain requirement and criteria for soldiers too. Or you can watch First Avenger for further information.
Re: None of you anti-MCU Fox's Marvel fans liked the Wolverine solos
You know what happens when soldiers get injured in a War? They stay injured and can never participate in any other War.
Ohhh now you're changing the meaning of casualties to benefit your argument..
You said there were no casualties in Civil War. You were thinking "nobody died" but Rhodey got injured and that still constitute to casualties. Now you're saying that soldiers stay injured and can never participate in any other War, wtf?
Ohhh now you're changing the meaning of casualties to benefit your argument..
You said there were no casualties in Civil War. You were thinking "nobody died" but Rhodey got injured and that still constitute to casualties. Now you're saying that soldiers stay injured and can never participate in any other War, wtf?
Re: None of you anti-MCU Fox's Marvel fans liked the Wolverine solos
Ohhh now you're changing the meaning of casualties to benefit your argument..
You said there were no casualties in Civil War. You were thinking "nobody died" but Rhodey got injured and that still constitute to casualties. Now you're saying that soldiers stay injured and can never participate in any other War, wtf?
He's still War machine in Infinity Wars, It didn't affected him in slightest(His War machine persona). How come that is a causality in any possible way?
Re: None of you anti-MCU Fox's Marvel fans liked the Wolverine solos
The point is that somebody got injured in Civil War, War casualties= either killed or injured..
Plain and simple.
Plain and simple.
Re: None of you anti-MCU Fox's Marvel fans liked the Wolverine solos
Casualty is either dying or effecting a person that much that he will never take part in any future Wars. Incase of Rhodey, Thanos is coming
Re: None of you anti-MCU Fox's Marvel fans liked the Wolverine solos
Avengers grossed 1.6 Billion in 2012
Avengers grossed 1.4 Billion in 2015
Yeah ok, and?
Avengers plus Spider-Man grossed 1.15B Billion in 2016.
A movie about Captain America continuing his search for Bucky. Bucky is the main plot of the story with the other Marvel characters as guest stars, you know it but you think subliminally throwing "Avengers plus Spider-Man" will disprove my argument, wrong.
At least With BvS, DCEU went 200 million upwards than downwards. So much for the "Best MCU Movie Ever".
At least nothing, shush!. Just give it up. You've lost. BVS didnt make a billion because Snyder/WB are idiots and you fanboys deep down know yall didnt like the movie but to keep your guards/egos up yall discredit Marvel.
Avengers grossed 1.4 Billion in 2015
Yeah ok, and?
Avengers plus Spider-Man grossed 1.15B Billion in 2016.
A movie about Captain America continuing his search for Bucky. Bucky is the main plot of the story with the other Marvel characters as guest stars, you know it but you think subliminally throwing "Avengers plus Spider-Man" will disprove my argument, wrong.
At least With BvS, DCEU went 200 million upwards than downwards. So much for the "Best MCU Movie Ever".
At least nothing, shush!. Just give it up. You've lost. BVS didnt make a billion because Snyder/WB are idiots and you fanboys deep down know yall didnt like the movie but to keep your guards/egos up yall discredit Marvel.
Re: None of you anti-MCU Fox's Marvel fans liked the Wolverine solos
Civil War was ashamed
And I thought the MCU were "kiddie" "comedy" and "upbeat"
The DCEU are surely ashamed. Batman is the only dark character in the Justice League, not all of them.
And I thought the MCU were "kiddie" "comedy" and "upbeat"
The DCEU are surely ashamed. Batman is the only dark character in the Justice League, not all of them.
Re: None of you anti-MCU Fox's Marvel fans liked the Wolverine solos
Batman is the only dark character in the Justice League,
Cyborg is as dark as Batman, considering his tragic backstory. Wonder Woman had gone through dark alterations as well.
not all of them.
You don't even read comics, bozo.
Re: None of you anti-MCU Fox's Marvel fans liked the Wolverine solos
You don't even read comics, bozo.
All you do is read through wikipedia, bozo.
All you do is read through wikipedia, bozo.
Re: None of you anti-MCU Fox's Marvel fans liked the Wolverine solos
All you do is read through wikipedia, bozo.
Just because that is what you you, doesn't mean everyone does that.
Maybe you and Samyboy gain most of your knowledge from the Internet, but I'm definitely more comic book fan than both of you are, since I did not start reading comics only after MCU became popular.
Re: None of you anti-MCU Fox's Marvel fans liked the Wolverine solos
Basically you are mad that X-men rights ain't going back to Marvel for another decade. Typical!
You wish. If Marvel Studios succeeded without Spider-Man, why does it need X-Men? Oh apparently, I dont know, Fantastic Four went back to Marvel.
You wish. If Marvel Studios succeeded without Spider-Man, why does it need X-Men? Oh apparently, I dont know, Fantastic Four went back to Marvel.
Re: None of you anti-MCU Fox's Marvel fans liked the Wolverine solos
You wish. If Marvel Studios succeeded without Spider-Man, why does it need X-Men?
Do you know which Title in Comics sold most number of Comics for Marvel??
Do you know which storyline in Comics sold most number of copies for Marvel??
And If Spider-man was not needed then why his character was so rushed in Civil War just like Wonder Woman in BvS?
And After Thanos who will the the next character who will warm up the seat for 3 phases. Kang, wait Kang is linked with Reed Richards. Doom, Galactus, Magneto?? Who is left for Marvel which is a big heavy weight name?
Oh apparently, I dont know, Fantastic Four went back to Marvel.
And That's not gonna happen either ways.
Re: None of you anti-MCU Fox's Marvel fans liked the Wolverine solos
And That's not gonna happen either ways.
Im not confirming it. Im only saying what I've heard.
And If Spider-man was not needed then why his character was so rushed in Civil War just like Wonder Woman in BvS?
Dont go the easy way in talking about Wonder Woman (although she was a waste a time), she doesnt have a big fanbase, she's popular because of her appearance and because she's a "strong woman" symbol, thats all her so called "fans" know about her. Anyways, you're a liar, Sony and Marvel made a deal about on Civil War. Even without Spidey, Civil War would've still succeeded, everybody knows that even you. Remember, MCU was succeeding without Spidey prior Sony's deal.
NOW! Man Of Steel had harsh reviews, although it succeeded financially but it wasnt what WB expected (they wanted a billion) but it didnt happen. How can they surpass MoS numbers? Batman. WB's desperation was to use Batman to save the day, which again, embarrassingly DIDNT REACH A BILLION!!!! Two of the worlds most iconic superheroes..
Over 800 million in total. Thats over a million away from MoS, are you fcking kidding me?
Im not confirming it. Im only saying what I've heard.
And If Spider-man was not needed then why his character was so rushed in Civil War just like Wonder Woman in BvS?
Dont go the easy way in talking about Wonder Woman (although she was a waste a time), she doesnt have a big fanbase, she's popular because of her appearance and because she's a "strong woman" symbol, thats all her so called "fans" know about her. Anyways, you're a liar, Sony and Marvel made a deal about on Civil War. Even without Spidey, Civil War would've still succeeded, everybody knows that even you. Remember, MCU was succeeding without Spidey prior Sony's deal.
NOW! Man Of Steel had harsh reviews, although it succeeded financially but it wasnt what WB expected (they wanted a billion) but it didnt happen. How can they surpass MoS numbers? Batman. WB's desperation was to use Batman to save the day, which again, embarrassingly DIDNT REACH A BILLION!!!! Two of the worlds most iconic superheroes..
Over 800 million in total. Thats over a million away from MoS, are you fcking kidding me?
Re: None of you anti-MCU Fox's Marvel fans liked the Wolverine solos
Im not confirming it. Im only saying what I've heard.
I've also 'heard' that earth is flat. so what?
Dont go the easy way in talking about Wonder Woman (although she was a waste a time), she doesnt have a big fanbase, she's popular because of her appearance and because she's a "strong woman" symbol, thats all her so called "fans" know about her. Anyways, you're a liar, Sony and Marvel made a deal about on Civil War. Even without Spidey, Civil War would've still succeeded, everybody knows that even you. Remember, MCU was succeeding without Spidey prior Sony's deal.
More Like Without Spidey, Civil War could have been much better than what it actually was.
But, more important question is "Would it hit the billion dollar mark??"
NOW! Man Of Steel had harsh reviews, although it succeeded financially but it wasnt what WB expected (they wanted a billion) but it didnt happen. How can they surpass MoS numbers? Batman. WB's desperation was to use Batman to save the day, which again, embarrassingly DIDNT REACH A BILLION!!!! Two of the worlds most iconic superheroes..
Over 800 million in total. Thats over a million away from MoS, are you fcking kidding me?
Avengers grossed 1.6 Billion in 2012
Avengers grossed 1.4 Billion in 2015
Avengers plus Spider-Man grossed 1.15B Billion in 2016.
At least With BvS, DCEU went 200 million upwards than downwards. So much for the "Best MCU Movie Ever".
Re: None of you anti-MCU Fox's Marvel fans liked the Wolverine solos
You cant talk sht about anything. BVS was suppose to make over a billion being that it debuts two DC icons together and supposedly "destroy" Marvel but it didnt happen, wtf is that?
Re: None of you anti-MCU Fox's Marvel fans liked the Wolverine solos
You cant talk sht about anything. BVS was suppose to make over a billion
Still made more than MOS, while AOU made less than Avengers and Civil War with RDJ+Avengers+Spider-man+Winter soldier sequel factor made less than AOU, what's the point of positive reviews if you can't surpass your previous mark. But I know JL will surpass BvS's mark.
Re: None of you anti-MCU Fox's Marvel fans liked the Wolverine solos