The Jerk : Explonation about the hight score?

Its awkward how such a silly and dull movie end up as a "comedy classic (its inculded in so many TOP 10/25/100 comedies of all times lists)" with such a high score.

I know that the main character is Retarded, but pretty mych everyone in this movies was an INBECILE or a total nutcase. That kills all the funny premise. Funny is when you have a retard communicating with normal people. It worked with Forest Gump / which makes it a great movie and a novel/.

It's a movie made for people with a sense of humor.

>>> It's a movie made for people with a sense of humor.

My name is snoozealarm and I approve of this response.


It should be against the law to use 'LOL'; unless you really did LOL!

keyword is juvenile though you need to add.

And this is the reason I'm glad the message boards are going away because of asshoIes like you.

Nothing wrong with being juvenile. Why so defensive? Why the anger?

It only works for normal people.

Normal people can laugh at The Jerk, but people like you, retarded, have no chance.

Sorry.

Im so glad that the estoreic, reincarnation beliver, follows me in every movie thread around the imdb.

That just confirms the kind of people who like this movie.
Thanks for that. Normal indeed

two points. 1) Forrest Gump isn't a comedy. 2) Navin isn't retardedhe's a Jerk.
p.s. it's spelled "explanation".

Furthermore, even an imbecile knows how to spell "imbecile".

1) yes it was a comedy-drama so you can quite easily say it's a comedy
2) he is retarded or borderline

---

Funny is when you have a retard communicating with normal people.

---

---

Explonation
hight
inculded
mych
INBECILE

---

Yep! I think I understand what you're on about. This is an hilarious post.

Why not discuss the topic rather than spelling?? I find it sad people tend to try to attack somebody for spelling mistakes rather than the argument they put forth.
The guy could also be dyslexic. Dyslexic people are not "retards". They can actually be very intelligent. Get a clue before you attack somebody like this based on their spelling.

It's because that's about the standards we had back in the late 80s for comedy.
If you look at SNL about the same time was similar crap. Martin has never ever been funny in my view. All his skits I've seen fall flat for me. Additionally people seem to confuse nostalgia with good cinema i.e. they watched this as kids and still have a soft spot for it like we all do for things we saw as kids that we liked. This is about the level of comedy a kid may find amusing.